-
On another note, some commenter wrote about how it was a good thing, and some other guy responded with probably the dumbest post I've ever -blam!-ing seen: [quote]BS!!! Only if you are a communist who is so pathetically weak do you subscribe to this. Communist Dems have no wish, desire or skill to work with any group that refuse to walk lockstep to their HATE AMERICA tactics. Derek is a prime example,,,APPLAUDINJG the shutting out of voices being represented by dissenters in the Senate. Hitler would love you Derek...go kiss your Dear Leader's boots now.[/quote] Come onnnnnn.
-
작성자: Ad Hoc 11/22/2013 2:53:09 AMIt's about time. I was sick of Republicans holding up Congress. They complain about everything Democrats do, while simultaneously not letting them do anything. I'm sure they'll filibuster it though. [spoiler]oh, wait, no they won't. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA![/spoiler]
-
2 답변작성자: Faliz18 11/22/2013 2:41:11 AM
-
9 답변>cnn faking tophuekek If this were Republicans then Democrats and everybody else would be up-in-arms over the whole thing. Damn hypocrites.
-
2 답변I feel like the words "Democrat" and "Republican" are interchangable synonyms for "Dumbass."
-
4 답변This is a little worrisome. Now they won't have it available to them when the Republicans inevitably take power again. This will come back to haunt them, you watch.
-
9 답변
-
2 답변People don't seem to realize this only applies to nominees to Lower Federal Courts and other positions - nominees from President Obama.
-
8 답변작성자: Gaara444 11/21/2013 8:02:09 PMSo basically Senate Democrats just want to pass anything they want with absolutely no opposition in any way, shape, or form by silencing the minorities power right to filibuster. They ignore the fact that all important/controversial filibusters weren't for piss reasons and they didn't do shit like read out of a cook book, they actually stayed on the topic they talked about. Pathetic.
-
11 답변
-
5 답변
-
3 답변
-
2 답변
-
1 답변