You seem to give the best score to the one who has made the most kills. However, a survival mode should not be rated like an FFA casual mode. Because this suggests to the players that they have to make kills at all costs without paying attention to the life pool. In survival, however, it is important above all not to die, as the name already implies. Therefore, I propose the following change: 1. first it is determined and rated who has done the most damage (+2) 2. then it is determined and rated who has suffered the least deaths (+1.5) 3. finally, it is determined and evaluated who has achieved the highest combat efficiency (+1)