JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

데스티니 가디언즈

데스티니 가디언즈에 관한 모든 것을 토론해봅시다.
6/25/2021 8:49:54 PM
36

We just gonna forget what happened before saints rampage?

I mean the fallen attacked humanity first, leaving no safe spaces on earth that people wouldn’t be hunted. After the city was founded he fallen still continued to attack us and bought all of the major houses to the last city to reclaim “their great machine” so whys saint the bad guy for going on the offensive?
English
#lore #destiny2

게시물 작성 언어:

 

다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • The Fallen can hold this L

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • [quote]I mean the fallen attacked humanity first, leaving no safe spaces on earth that people wouldn’t be hunted. After the city was founded he fallen still continued to attack us and bought all of the major houses to the last city to reclaim “their great machine” so whys saint the bad guy for going on the offensive?[/quote] Allow me to put this into perspective... Fallen BAD. Doesn't matter what anyone says, the FALLEN are bad. The eliksni are good... The eliksni are basically what they wanted to be, honerable and most importantly? Want to live in cohabitation and peace with humanity. Anyone who says Saint is a bad person or a murderer is wrong, saint went after the fallen who attacked the city. He went after the Kells.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • 작성자: Corrick II 6/26/2021 3:54:34 AM
    I go on a rant about this every time Bungie tries the same hamfisted attempt to make Guardians look like bad guys, as if it’s some deep narrative twist. We. Were. Attacked. First. We’ve been defending ourselves the whole time. If these mf’ers don’t want us to kill them, they really need to stop trying to kill us. Simple as that. It was even more hilarious when the scorn baron tried to turn it back on us calling us murderers and dead ones or whatever. Like dude, your entire race consists of crazy reanimated fire demon exploding psychos. OF COURSE I’m going to shoot all of you in the face. It’s not clever writing. Bungie’s writers need to stop trying to be “deep”.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

    20 답변
    • Saint was correct in executing the crusade agsint the fallen. They almost wiped out humanity and needed to be crippled and dealt with brutally, as a show of strength and to remind them to never launch another offensive of the city. We shifted the momentum when we defeated them, we needed to keep pushing to make sure that they stayed down. While non military fallen died it did lower their moral even more and crippled their houses and leadership. Would mithrax join us if the fallen where just as powerful as pre Twilght Gap? Probably not, as he would be confident his people could take the city. The fallen grew desperate at the end of d1, house devils burned their banners. House of Dusk is crippled and so is house of salvation, and house light is an ally. Through strength and making the enemy weaker, this will bring them to the negotiating table with us holding advantage. The same happened with citatl. We destroyed her war council and weakened her position and it made her more open to what we wanted out of the negotiations and not her terms. If we went with her terms then she would be leading us. But we weakened her and showed her our strength. This made her follow our terms. Mithrax knows we are to strong so that likely played a factor into him and his followers to join our side. It's in the past now, and we have a valuable ally. We can hope more fallen will join us or they will face defeat.

      게시물 작성 언어:

       

      다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

      3 답변
      • Uh sir this is a Space Wendy’s

        게시물 작성 언어:

         

        다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

        2 답변
        • <It's a weird contrast between what is talked about in lore vs what's talked about in-game. The only real positive bridges between these are Eido in her second round of dialogue and Saint-14 (albeit rather quick thanks to seasonal storytelling still not being *quite* perfect and because this season's message is a bit less subtle than Chosen). Saint's growth is obvious because he knows the atrocities the Fallen committed but starts seeing that Mithrax's attempts at an alliance are genuine and that House Light, even if many of its members are from the old Houses, no longer subscribe to that belief. Eido's singular quote about how the blame should go to the old Kells for starting the war is entirely accurate, and we even see this with Namrask in the lore, who laments how he may have been the first Fallen to strike against humanity out of rage and how he fears that he created Saint-14 as he appears in Eliksni culture, specifically NEW Eliksni culture. Namrask and Mithrax in the lore are by far some of the most interesting characters, as they constantly admit that at one point or another they've killed people. Namrask's whole story is about how he no longer wishes to be a warrior knowing what he did and how it's gotten out of hand. Mithrax also shows regret, especially after the events of the Reef Wars, where he met Sjur Eido, and even further with the Red War, where he met us. Saint's crusades were entirely reactionary, and ultimately the blame should not be on his shoulders, but those of the Kells of old that started to fight, of which few remain and those that do have come to regret their actions knowing the damage they've caused. You still have vestiges of their past through people like Phylaks, Skolas, Eramis. All Fallen. In the lore, Mithrax understands this. However, the game's dialogue does seem a little inconsistent with this, as multiple times I found myself asking the same question as the title of this post. The fact that Six Fronts and Twilight Gap get so few mentions is a testament to the seasonal model's flaws that persist. Even Chosen, which I'd have considered the best season if SoA never happened, still has some flaws. This just has a smidge more... most of which about Savathun but this also has some of the blame as well.>

          게시물 작성 언어:

           

          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

          5 답변
          • you sort of answer that with your own question. the "Fallen" were bad because they came to our home and tried to kick us out and kill us. So we defended the City at Six Fronts and Twilight Gap. What Saint then in turn did, was go to their houses (literally) and kick them out and kill them. So he became the Bad guy to them. They were in a quest to reclaim the entity that abandoned them and found other people, thus Misraacks founded House Light out of members of the old houses Saint went in a tried to destroy to return to that purpose, alongside humanity. It's hinted that Saint didn't just stop with the fighters and didn't accept surrender or show mercy. That's going too far. Misraacks' whole personal journey is receiving Mercy and Saint was without it. Misraacks does NOT excuse the old houses, in fact he made his house specifically to contradict their teachings and pirate culture. His house strives for cooperation and they deserve that chance so that the Eliksni may once again bask in the Light of the Great Machine. [b]We do not forget what happened to cause Saints Crusade, We just don't apply that to people that had nothing to do with it.[/b]

            게시물 작성 언어:

             

            다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

          • Get off the forums Lakshmi-2 no one likes you.

            게시물 작성 언어:

             

            다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

            1 답변
            • He’s not the bad guy, he’s just seen as a demon in the fallen’s eyes. Hey, isn’t there another famous Bungie character who the enemy race sees as a demon?

              게시물 작성 언어:

               

              다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

              3 답변
              • We've been fighting the fallen for years, we've destroyed all of their houses, killed their kells, and brought them to near extinction. What gain is there to fighting them further?

                게시물 작성 언어:

                 

                다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

              • Because just like Humanity, the Eliksnis are composed with a lot of different people and point of view.

                게시물 작성 언어:

                 

                다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

              • You mean, are you going to forget the clip of mithrax talking to saint in a cutscene?

                게시물 작성 언어:

                 

                다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

              • One of those "everyone is the hero of their own story" deals.

                게시물 작성 언어:

                 

                다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

              • I see it more of a mutually beneficial agreement and truce between both our people. Once the endless night is over, a single wrong move from house light and their kell will fall.

                게시물 작성 언어:

                 

                다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                1 답변
                • Crap story.

                  게시물 작성 언어:

                   

                  다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                • I don’t know that human beings ever forget, but they have an amazing capacity to move on. As one example, the first Japanese car was imported into the United States sixteen years after the bombing of Pearl Harbour, while Japanese electronics were being imported into the USA a couple of years previous to that. This war with the Fallen/Eliksni has to end eventually. While humanity won’t forget, it will move on.

                  게시물 작성 언어:

                   

                  다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                  1 답변
                  • Ya know people talk shit on bungie but it’s posts like these that show me they do a good job story wise creating conversations such as these

                    게시물 작성 언어:

                     

                    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                  • He's not the bad guy, they are just afraid of him. Rightfully so, they should fear us all! We protect our own.

                    게시물 작성 언어:

                     

                    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                  • Saint is correct - crush under foot.

                    게시물 작성 언어:

                     

                    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                    19 답변
                    • He’s as much the bad guy as the Eliksni are the bad guys to humanity. To the people of the city, any/every eliksni is directly involved in the massacre of their people over time. On the other hand, the Eliksni fear guardians, but especially saint. You could go in circles and say “the fallen did it first! But saint shouldn’t have killed innocents! But they killed innocent humans too!” Either side is going to look at the atrocities committed by the other as being worse. Saint is being the bigger person and being a representative of humanity by giving up and atoning for his actions just as mithrax is doing so for the fallen. At some point you gotta put your weapons down and look for another option.

                      게시물 작성 언어:

                       

                      다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                      9 답변
                      • Would we have done anything different? The houses are dead. Most of the Eliksni that came from old houses had to work for their kell or else they starved of ether. The fallen have been starved to the point of eating corpses. Oh yeah! that reminds me! The fallen-eating-babies thing? That’s mostly a myth. Did [i]some[/i] of them commit atrocities against humanity? Yes. Did Saint have every right to slaughter them? Yes. Were innocents on [i]both[/i] sides caught in the crossfire? Yes. In the dark future we basically did the exact same thing they planned to do.

                        게시물 작성 언어:

                         

                        다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                        18 답변
                        • One mans hero, is another mans terrorist.

                          게시물 작성 언어:

                           

                          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                        • The cutscene isn't calling him a bad guy. That's oversimplifying things. It's humanizing the eliksni. It makes a point to show that saint-14 murdered children and non-combatants just as often as he slew warbands and leaders. But not because he's a bad guy, because he didn't take the time to learn the difference, and we can't fault him for that; It was a time of war. The fallen just attacked us. But nonetheless his actions were fueled by hatred, vengeance. The things the Darkness thrives upon. Both the Eliksni and Humanity did terrible things to each other, but we have to let these concepts of "blame" and "bad guys" go, replace them with forgiveness, or at the very least understanding.

                          게시물 작성 언어:

                           

                          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                        • Agree with u, they had it coming.

                          게시물 작성 언어:

                           

                          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                        • It's not so much he's the bad guy, rather he, according to Mithraax, was to the fallen as they were to humanity, the difference being he is almost immortal. The fallen could be stopped, he couldn't, and wasn't above doing worse to them than they did to humanity. Having heard Mithraax's story, and his interaction with the fallen child, has him questioning who in that moment the real monster is. He is a living nightmare to the fallen, and thanks to Lakshmi and New Monarchy, things are about to get violent in the fallen quarters. God forbid any fallen die, especially Mithraax's daughter because that will only encourage fallen to do the opposite of what Mithraax might want and will only make things worse for them. Fallen can't fight back or retaliate without "proving" Lakshmi right. Vanguard can't protect them while dealing with Quiria and Savathun without making themselves look like enemies of the people they're trying to protect. As Osiris/ Savathun said, the city is a "powder keg".

                          게시물 작성 언어:

                           

                          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                        • Because he killed the ones that didnt deserve it. Both sides killed innocents that didnt deserve it.

                          게시물 작성 언어:

                           

                          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                        회원님은 해당 콘텐츠를 볼 수 없습니다.
                        ;
                        preload icon
                        preload icon
                        preload icon