For the damage the deal, why in the world do they cost 8 AMMO FOR A HEAVY ATTACK. If yall made it 4 people might actually consider them decent in pvp.
-
2 답변Don’t know about PvP but Black Talon was pretty decent in PvE and Gambit for me. It still is really, but I do miss the pre nerf version. Plus I can get up to 70 ammo for it with Mods. Still my go to exotic apart from Witherhoard for PvE and Gambit.
-
I get the argument that they're ranges so they should do less damage because you avoid danger better, but that damage is abysmal. I whole heartedly agree that they need a buff. What they could really do is take the whirlwind blade idea and make it to where you get kills swinging the blade at enemies to charge the cast and then fire off a crazy high damage (think Black Talon but you actually have to work for it and it doesn't track) blast.
-
6 답변작성자: Jonah-ralKenobi 3/15/2021 12:46:20 PMNo, they may need to be buffed in PvE, but they are pretty strong in PvP. Especially since they currently allow for a ranged heavy with three peek potential we don’t want to incentivize the use of these swords more. Also, I’m pretty sure black talon gets two heavy attacks and it is actually really powerful. I’ve seen it take out supers or two guardians.
-
1 답변People already use caster swords in PvP and I’ve been caught out quite a lot because of it
-
Yeah they aren't too viable at the moment. Voporal can be useful but I wish their was some other gimmick. Like when you throw the heavy attack, it creates a AOE for a few seconds that damages everything a good amount. However at the moment it's just 8 ammo for a possibly kill on a major.
-
7 답변작성자: joanespotatos 3/14/2021 12:01:08 PMI think it would be better if it had a damage buff. Its a sword, that cancels the problem swords have. The range. Of course it should cost a lot of ammo.
-
10 답변