JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

토론장

7/29/2020 3:13:00 AM
26
I mean...the Gardener literally uses the Traveler as a means to cheat the system and help the weak survive the Game of Life. So...yes. The Traveler, and by extension, the Gardener, must be destroyed so that the strong could prevail as it should be.
English

게시물 작성 언어:

 

다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • By that logic you should put a bullet through your Ghost, then yourself.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • Oh, I certainly would put a bullet through my Ghost if I could. I on the other hand had no choice in the matter. Which is why the Darkness hasn’t killed us.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • But by your own logic you are weak life and shouldn’t even be alive.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • No. Don’t twist my words. By my logic, The Gardener and the Traveler should be dead. Not us. I didn’t say the weak should die, I said the ones keeping the weak alive should die.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • No, you stated the Traveler helped the weak survive when they shouldn’t have. You’re included in that bracket. You should be dead, and to follow the purest interpretation of the Sword Logic where necromancy is a taboo you must end your own existence.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • When did I ever say “when they shouldn’t have”? Stop. Twisting. My. Words. It’s not a good look on you, pal.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • 작성자: Shockwave 989 7/31/2020 11:41:44 AM
    Do you then admit that we were supposed to survive? Because evidently we weren’t, we were powerless in the face of the Collapse and only the Traveler saved us. You preach the fake doctrine of the Dredgens while completely ignoring the fact that the great big ball in the sky is the whole reason why we’re still alive and why the Space Doritos even give you the slightest consideration.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • Of course we were supposed to survive. Because the “Space Doritos” that you love to give a bad name let us live because they saw our potential to be strong.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • 작성자: Shockwave 989 7/31/2020 4:03:36 PM
    Incorrect, unless you wish to imply that the Space Doritos actively forced the creation of Ghost and the utilisation of Light by resurrected Guardians. Because if you haven’t noticed, without the Light we wouldn’t have stood a chance. The Darkness still fully stood behind Oryx and the Hive as it’s Champions at that point, hence why Oryx still had the Darkness’s favour. His death was what created the current interest that the Darkness was in Guardians specifically, NOT Humanity as a whole. Although Eris is a rather interesting exception to that, though she has picked up Hive sorcery since losing her Light.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • You’re absolutely brainwashed by the City and Vanguard/Guardian dogma. I forgot I can’t argue or debate with someone who refuses to look at the evidence from a different view

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • 작성자: Shockwave 989 7/31/2020 7:16:18 PM
    Ain’t any evidence either way. Just going by the admittance of the Darkness itself. [quote]”The enemy insinuates that we are hobbled by the [b]Traveler’s protection[/b][/quote] [quote]”If Traveler and Humanity cooperate, both suffer.”[/quote] Current path. [quote]”If humanity mains the Traveler as it tries to flee, both are destroyed.”[/quote] Debunking the Rasputin shot the Traveler theory for the final [quote]”But if the Traveler chooses to help us, and we turn against it, offer it to the enemy.... The enemy suggests this would have been our salvation.”[/quote] The Darkness’s desired outcome The Darkness does not state that the Traveler is manipulating us for it’s own selfish ends. The Darkness does not state the Traveler is the true evil. The Darkness only argues that to follow the Traveler is to be coddled, that we should instead embrace a bloodier calling. In it’s argumentation and in your argumentation we see a similar falsehood to the lie that was fed to the Three Sister all those millennia ago when they struck a bargain with the Worm Gods. Much like the Hive cannot ever be part of the shape due to the very bargain that empowered them, we could not have arisen to this position without the very Light the Darkness so heavily critiques. It’s less city dogma and more of an open mind. If I was the city dogma type, I wouldn’t have plunged headfirst into Toland’s writing and I wouldn’t humour the teachings of Ulan-Tan and I definitely wouldn’t have sided with the Drifter. But do go on and spew your nihilistic viewpoint.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • “Nihilistic”?? I’m just trying to survive with the winning side. That’s the opposite of “nihilistic”. There’s no nihilism here, bud.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • I would consider siding with the Darkness to be an abandonment of all moral principles, so yes it would fall under a definition of nihilism, at least in this subjective interpretation.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • You just said it yourself. “Subjective”. There’s no room for feelings in battle. Objectively speaking, logically speaking, siding with the Darkness and embracing it is the only winning strategy. And I don’t know about you, but I’d rather win and stay alive than fail and lose my life.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • Shows how much backbone you’ve got. I’ll be laughing all the way to the vault when siding with the Darkness isn’t the only way to win.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • [spoiler]Heya buddy, sent ya a message.[/spoiler] I mean, if the Dark loses, nothing will ever die again, but if it wins, nothing will ever live again. I say we get rid off both.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • And who told you “nothing” will ever live again? The Darkness isn’t here to destroy ALL life. That’s biased propaganda. The Darkness is only here to destroy the WEAK life.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • And compared to a god, what is strong?

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • 작성자: DarkenedAcolyte 7/29/2020 2:49:13 PM
    The Guardians. Well, not Guardians, but everyone the Light brought back. We’ve killed gods.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • <We've killed "gods", we have not killed Gods.>

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • Same thing.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • <Not when one is powerful by default.>

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • 작성자: Petra Fisher 8/1/2020 10:57:04 PM
    Crota? Dealt with.....twice. Oryx? He was pretty powerful, but nothing four people with rocket launchers couldn’t handle. Panoptys? Often overlooked (for lack of a difficult fight) but that was a considerable feat in my eyes. Xol? Wanted us to kill him. Riven? Was happy we beat her, but was actually trying to kill us (I think). So that’s a point for us. Savathûn? Pending..... [spoiler]Those are all the beings I remember that I’d consider powerful enough to be called godlike.[/spoiler]

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • 작성자: JVNori 8/1/2020 5:34:46 PM
    Don't forget Crota. I'm not sure if you count Atheon and the Sol Inherent, but Crota and his brood wiped out thousands of Guardians and slain Eris Morn's fireteam. We should count him since he's considered an Ascendant hive god.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • Well, I think the Winnower is now too angry to simply leave the game to its default state. Remember, the Winnower and Gardener once would simply oversee the flower game but the Winnower made itself into a rule within the game to counter the Gardener doing the same. I dont think the Winnower can just remove its playing pieces (The Pyramids) from the board, so we are stuck eternally balancing the two until a greater force can severely limit or remove both. Only force once capable of that was formless Mara Sov before she limited herself and the rest of the Awoken to be human-like.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

회원님은 해당 콘텐츠를 볼 수 없습니다.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon