JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

데스티니 가디언즈

데스티니 가디언즈에 관한 모든 것을 토론해봅시다.
작성자: Drake 6/16/2020 6:52:51 PM
6

Why are we keeping Nessus?

Seriously, we are getting rid of the Leviathan and keeping Nessus? What are you guys smoking Bungie? Nessus has been getting DEVOURED for the last 3 years and it's the one Destination that isn't getting the boot? I get that Nessus is BIG and you guys are probably proud of it- but it's just as irrelevant as the other destinations and probably takes up MORE memory/space in the game than all the others. Getting rid of Mars makes sense cause all the content tied to it is irrelevant as well as the destination not being very fun or interesting to begin with. Mercury as a patrol has ALWAYS sucked and I think everyone is tired of the wasted potential of the Infinite Forest. (Also what's gonna happen to the lighthouse guys?) Io dosen't have alot going for it, but at least feels more mysterious and relevant to the over-arching story of Destiny especially at this point with this season. All I am really trying to say is this - Get rid of Nessus, but keep the Leviathan and actually work on making all your raid/end-game activities relevant. Maybe make a featured/rotating raid each week like in D1 Age of Triumph so the older raids can drop current/Pinnacle gear once in awhile.

게시물 작성 언어:

 

다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • I would have much rather they at the bare minimum have kept the tribute hall since that's a dedicated target practice playground, along with the added bad juju mission. Like the vex explanation makes sense but why not just unvault Venus to replace nessus instead of adding the cosmodrome since that was at least the legitimate location of the vault of glass and we have the edz which is the better version of the cosmodrome anyway in every sense besides nostalgia. Even keeping io over nessus would have at least have kept the whisper mission which is one of the best exotic quests you can do on any given planet minus zero hour and maybe the last word. I would've been happy with them at least keeping the campaign for the game in a format akin to daily heroic missions in a set area of certain maps which would have been doable and easier for them to upkeep in comparison to whole planets which was the main reason they vaulted them in the first place

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • Yeah tbh I agree. I don't like the idea of vaulting content - I understand some games do this, many more don't, yadda yadda - but if given the choice between Nessus and Leviathan my preference would be the Leviathan. Way more to do than Nessus itself.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • They want to keep Nessus so you can obtain sunset forge weapons and sunset destination weapons that are useless.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • Because it's my cats name.

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • They’re keeping Nessus for the forges

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • I agree it’s completely illogical, personally I think Mars should’ve stayed for story reasons

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

회원님은 해당 콘텐츠를 볼 수 없습니다.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon