Let's be honest with ourselves, that weapon had the most satisfying headshot feeling ever
Edit: I realize that it's probably too late to re-introduce it, but why not make a sister rifle? Maybe with some kind of SIVA or Taken deviation on it?
-
2 답변Issa dead game. What is there to bring back? Bungie killed Destiny from the start! Lots of people told me that here so they must be right. [spoiler]545k guardians signed in today- but borderlands 3 killed destiny and most said our population should've dropped by 90%........ our average on lulls is 600k...................[/spoiler]
-
2 답변The arguments people are making against this are ludicrous. They never should have taken any of the d1 exotics out. They shouldn’t just disappear from the universe. It was the only sniper that used PRIMARY AMMO, and all of you saying it will be broken because of that are just plain wrong. It actually takes a decent amount of skill to use. There’s a reason little Jimmie couldn’t throw it on and go and get 25 kills a game with it. It creates a skill gap but apparently that’s not a thing you people want. It was one of the most fun and unique games to use
-
3 답변A day since you posted and your up vote count is ZERO. Epic fail. If the up vote showed negative count I reckon yours would be negative.
-
1 답변309 responses. 0 upvotes Bungie, it's fairly safe to say we don't want another reskin.
-
1 답변
-
6 답변
-
2 답변
-
1 답변
-
1 답변
-
1 답변
-
3 답변
-
1 답변
-
8 답변Only if it randomly back fires and kills the shooter, as well as having a tendency to jam on reload.
-
3 답변
-
12 답변
-
1 답변
-
7 답변No more returning weapons. I would like to see them just merge D2 with D1 and be done with it.
-
7 답변Nope, i'm more than mad with a primary ammo gl on crucible right now, i don't want a primary ammo sniper now, even if it's a nice bolt sniper
-
4 답변No they should be only be putting new stuff in the game. This why they keep putting old stuff back and its always some of the worst exotics of d1
-
2 답변No thank you. Some original content would be nice for a change... Go back and play D1 if you want the D1 stuff...
-
8 답변
-
3 답변
-
1 답변
-
13 답변Anyone saying we don't need No Land because of kinetic snipers has no understanding of how ammo works or what it means to be a primary weapon. Being a kinetic weapon does not make a gun a primary. Being a kinetic weapon does not make a gun a primary. Being a kinetic weapon does not make a gun a primary. What makes a gun a primary is if it uses primary ammo. All those kinetic snipers still use special ammo. They are not primary weapons. This the same reason why primary ammo using guns in the energy slot are still considered primary weapons. If we bring back No Land Beyond, it will once again be the *only* primary sniper, because right now there isn't any. But that's not even the point. The reason we need No Land Beyond is not because it used primary ammo, we need it back because it used iron sights. There NEEDS to be a sniper that uses iron sights. That needs to be included in EVERY fps ever made.