Narration *Ding*

I have the perfect antithesis to Cinemasins. Thanks to Cinemawins, I hear his voice and look for the good in a movie. Whether it be storytelling, choreography, CGI, the list goes on. Not to mention, Cinemasins hates movies for the sack of views, and does very little to actually look up info. Wins on the other hand does his research, like all the damn time. He did gun research for John Wick and nailed home every little point. I recommend watching this guy

Watch cinemawins and replace the nit picky stuff with pleasant small details that you can appreciate.

I hate that channel. What's the point in hating on literally every aspect of a film/game? And they barely ever mention even a single positive. And most of the time they're flat out wrong anyway. I haven't watched I Hate Everything for the same reason, just in case he's the same.

I don't watch or pay too much attention to entertainment critics for this reason. You see, the thing about storytelling, is that it is very methodical. All stories, at their most basic core, follow the same structure; authors then have a variety of mechanics and devices to customize and make it their own. These are often called tropes. Everything is an inspiration or derivative from something else, because that's how humans work; our lives are shaped by the things we see and experience outside of ourselves. What I am getting at is that cliche is only cliche if the audience perceives it as such; it is entirely subjective to the viewers. What is original today may be cliche tomorrow, and if someone sees a proclaimed cliche for the first time, they won't understand why it's cliche. The very word cliche itself should be seeming cliche right about now as you read this. That's how cliche's work. What is also true is that something cliche for one generation may be revitalized in the next. This happens quite often, with old genres/aesthetics/themes arising out of a sense of nostalgic charm, even if they were hated around their heyday ~20 years prior. General criticism is highly useful for the author to gain another perspective, but those who make a profession out of it will nitpick every little imperfection regardless of whether or not the target audience would even notice or care about it without being told so. They are usually nothing more than paid hypocrites, looking for perfection when no one and no work of the world is perfect. If anything, the flaws are what give a work as much identity as its beauties, because that is what makes it a reflection of the human that created it.

Price of being a heavy YouTube surfer. I find myself wondering why the HISHE version of things never happened (just remember, Eagles solve everything).

I stopped watching those videos years ago because they got incredibly nit picky and started coming up with the stupidest and most heinous points in movies that nobody cares about. Their viewpoints have started to cripple the minds of some of my favorite movie review Youtubers too. I suggest everyone stop watching CinemaSins for this exact reason.

This post does not contain a lap dance. [spoiler]*ding*[/spoiler]

Every time I see a character eating an apple I think that they’re an asshole. You’re not alone

Ever since I started watching cinemasins, a voice in my head would just start pointing out cliches and continuity errors and plot holes, or things like: “They survived this” “Skip!” “Rooolllll Credits!” (that’s my favorite) And so on. Sometimes at the theaters I would lean over to my sister and spout a critique. I don’t [i]not[/i] like this, in fact I quite enjoy it. Now I see through the lies of the Jed-*cough* um I mean I can see through the music and dramatic editing. I can see how ridiculous these movies are and enjoy knowing that. And knowing how cliche these plots are... Plus, cinemasins allows me to see terrible movies Im probably not gonna watch, but make it funny! [spoiler]im ranting what have you done?...[/spoiler]