Morgan Freeman: Stop talking about it.
sjw.exe has crashed.
Woah DerpyTaco made a controversial post. Oh no!
🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖🥖
Also that guy in Virginia did nothing wrong.
English
#Offtopic
-
2 답변작성자: themirror2man 2/21/2019 1:33:26 AMI've seen unjust behavior inside of families and inside of racial groups . [black on black, white on white, Latino on latino..] Is that racism? I've known Puerto Ricans who hate Mexicans, Mexicans who hate Guatemalans... black folk who call other black folk the MOST vile discriminating terms.... white folk who use and abuse other whites to the point of suicide. What gives? Is it REALLY about skin color? I don't think so, IMO it's about greed plain and simple. "I deserve... you do not." Why? "BECAUSE I SAY SO!!" seriously? Bullying? Greed and stinginess? -blam!- that. No wonder in my mind why so many are so depressed and angry. You hope,.... denied... you work.... denied.. you love... denied... you pray... denied... What is left? You kill? Please no. A wise person once told me we all are houses with different paint, nothing more. Is deception and denial of respect humanities #1 priority? It seems so at times. I just think the definition/reporting of racism needs to be expanded. IMO it isn't just about skin, gender, sexuality...etc. it's about a hostile drive inside of people.
-
7 답변Racism stems from a sense of proper individuality. People substitute culture for personality. Everyone bases their value on how different they are from one group and how alike they are to another. People think if their group is better than another, then they’re automatically better themselves without doing anything. Having pride in your culture or in your heritage is -blam!- if you haven’t actually contributed to it. It’s impressive what some cultures have accomplished, sure, but the pyramids weren’t built by baby boomers. The Great Wall wasn’t put up by millennials. I wasn’t out there in the -blam!-ing fields with Chavez. I’m appreciative of my culture to an extent, but I take no pride in it. I can only take pride in what I have personally done. I don’t give a shit if you’re Scottish if you weren’t fighting the English with William Wallace. I don’t give a shit how you’re related to George Washington if you’re handing me a coke at McDonald’s at 2 in the morning. The easiest way to validate yourself is by invalidating someone else. And the most readily available avenue, besides wealth, is race and culture. No race is better than any other, but so long as we refuse to separate ourselves from collective identities there will always be this kind of tribal conflict. While the past will never not affect the future, at some point we have to stop arguing over whose dad could (or did) beat up whose dad.
-
5 답변
-
Ironic this question is asked in an online forum. Seems to me any answer is moot. It isn’t necessary to end racism. It is only required to make it unacceptable behavior. This is why I laugh at people who think racism has been dealt with because of some laws or amendments. Civil rights ONLY happened because a lot of White people made it unacceptable to stop Blacks from voting. They made it unacceptable to lynch, -blam!- and beat Black people. And because it was unacceptable, the laws were enforced. Oh, soul, surely you jest, you say? Blacks had the right to vote loooong before the civil rights movement. Indeed, Blacks had quite a lot of new rights after the civil war. Where’d that get them? No one ever says it, but I will. Black people made the greatest sacrifices during the civil rights movement, but White people fought the toughest battles. None of it was easy, but no one can deny how difficult it is to stand up to your friend, your father, husband, your doctor, or police and tell them to their face how wrong they are, especially when to say nothing would be so comfortable, even prosperous. That’s where the change really happened - in homes and shops and churches and precincts and factories and schools and bars all over the country. And, no, not everywhere, but enough, to the point where supremacists and nationalists and [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] were eventually considered terrorists, which meant they were policed by the FBI. And here we are today. Any white person speaking out against racism is marginalized by political labels. Major news networks and the executive branch of government are hell bent of detoothing and destabilizing the FBI. That same branch will not denounce racism even in the wake of murder. Our social mores are driven by platforms that do not require accountability, and in the safety of anonymity we are happy to proclaim our worst selves, which happens to also make us collectively the most vulnerable to malign interests that could care less what color we are. You want to end it? Make it unacceptable everywhere you go!
-
I don't think we can to be honest. There will always be people that just hate everything about you. It might not even be about your color. All you can do is be the best person you can be. You can't change everyone's opinions especially by getting angry and fighting them. You can't beat the hatred out of other people. If you try then you are only adding more reasons for people to hate you. Other people see what you did and they begin to not like you. Now that doesn't mean you can't defend yourself. If someone is trying to cause you any harm, by all means protect yourself. But don't become the aggressor.
-
6 답변New law. You can only parent a child with a person who’s skin colour is a sufficiently different shade. Over generations the all colour shades will merge closer and closer until it’s indistinguishable. After that any racially motivated assault would be impossible and we can live happily in a world where the only times you will be assaulted are for profit, being a dick, liking dick or simply for the attackers amusement. 🤗
-
9 답변
-
4 답변
-
13 답변
-
1 답변