{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/15/2018 12:38:38 PM
21
To those whom it may concern.
I did not care for the Harry Potter series, and by series i mean film and novels. The series as a whole is predictable and bland.
Also Emma Watson is not attractive, she's bland. She is not ugly, but she is not beautiful. She's a solid 5, perhaps the most secure 5 ever. Not a 5.1 or a 4.9, just 5.
-
2 답변
-
7 답변
-
1 답변Never seen the movies or read the books, so I can't say anything either way. [spoiler]Not my choice.[/spoiler]
-
1 답변
-
5 답변
-
1 답변
-
4 답변
-
8 답변작성자: NorthElite 1/16/2018 7:26:32 AM
-
3 답변Thank you for your feedback, we will make sure to pass this on to the autistic kid that likes to draw dicks on stuff.
-
3 답변
-
1 답변
-
1 답변
-
1 답변
-
3 답변Hi, My name is Chris H and I was just looking for some clarification on your comment. Would you say that Emma is a 5 in the first movie, last, or both?
-
3 답변I agree, Emma Watson in The Sorcer's Stone is not attractive. Mainly because she is a child.
