This is not an original thread, as I stole it from a b.net post I was a while ago. I wanna keep my debating skills sharp, so you guys post a comment making an argument (it can be about anything), and I'll try to argue against it (regardless of my personal beliefs). Anyone who can stump me in a debate wins!
-
1 답변
-
3 답변
-
1 답변
-
3 답변
-
3 답변I'll turn on Statist-Mode for this one. Ahem... "Allowing an unchecked flow of immigrants into the U.S. is economically damaging. These unskilled laborers fill jobs that could otherwise be filled by Americans that need them. Not only that, but some receive state benefits - directly or indirectly. This places another burden on taxpayers. We ought to ramp up border security in order to mitigate illegal immigration, and we need to make sure that we only let in the best and brightest."
-
3 답변
-
7 답변작성자: Esko 4/1/2017 4:41:03 AMI remember hearing a story from when this place was the Flood, where a guy sarcastically argued with another guy, and convinced him that paedophilia or something was ok, and then slammed him for being -blam!-ing insane. Kinda wanna see something like that happen here. Anyway, my argument is that the Flood was better than Offtopic
-
3 답변
-
1 답변
-
1 답변Child molesters will never amount to anything in life. They are a cancer to society and should all be put down.