Kind of a halo fanboy so i wont be offended if you call me one but i will also present facts as to why its good. Also please post reasons why you disagree.
First of all, it launched with half the content and ill admit that sucked. But you cant blame 343 for not finishing in time when microsoft is the one enforcing the release date. And they made up for it with free dlc drops. Next the gameplay is truly innovative and smooth while still remaining halo, you cant expect 343 to not change the gameplay because then halo will never evolve. It also doesnt really change halo's play style if you think about it. Sometimes playing like the originals even gives you an edge in MP, just play swat and you'll soon realize that non sprinters and boosters trump those who use them. Plus they've given us remasters of the original trilogy (although its hard to find matches on them and that is a damn shame). Also warzone is not a mandatory game mode for all who whine about it and its microtrans, you can play in arena and its completely dropped the loadout system (thank god) and returned to the roots of even player starts with weapons on map. Its multiplayer is extremely fun imo.
Now on to the lore and how people think it contradicts itself. First of all the trailers were a little misleading true, but try watching them through the eyes of someone who hasn't been chief in the past, colonies are destroyed and people are dying and and chief is right in the middle of it all. The lore specifically says that oni is pretty much the evil boogeymen of the unsc and they look out for all of humanity from all threats, and oni probably thought chief was a threat, given his attachment to cortana and that he went off the grid. 343 has used these types of trailers before. Its kind of like a propaganda broadcast. Back in halo 4 the trailer said that humanity is now the giants, when really humanity is still weak and recovering from the war. The only reason no other race tried to finish us off is because oni has been spying on the races, picking out major threats and neutralizing them. Oni is the reason the elites are at war with each other really.
Now about how the chief and locke showdown shouldnt have even been close. First of all spartan 3s were just as good as spartan 2s. The main differences were that theyre super soldier treatment was much more efficient when they were made and had a far lower mortality rate, and that they werent given mjolnir armor, instead they were given light cloaking armor. Next thing is that in New Blood, buck claims that the S2s were like titans, S3s gods, and S4s demigods. You can take this one or two ways. One is that he was stating them in chronological order from first to latest, because in actual greek mythology, thats the order they came in. And a thing you should know is that demigods were able to kill gods and titans, it may have been difficult for them but definitely not impossible. Now if you took it the other way as that he was stating their power hierarchy. The reason chief seemed to have a hard time is because he simply does not like taking human life. He said in one of the first three books that hes spent a lot of his life defending humanity even though he was made to kill insurrectionists. He then goes on to say that if the war ever ends and humanity is left standing, he doesnt know if hed actually be able to take a human life again. So with that chief simply tried to neutralize locke, not kill him. Also the whole thing that they both have gen 2 armour is a well known reason for them being evenly matched.
Now onto how cortana is the villain. This is actually shown in the game so everyone should know it. At the end of halo 4 cortana basically dies by splitting multiple rampant personalties apart. So basically the cortana that we grew up with died in halo 4 but one of her rampant personalities survived onboard the didacts ship and somehow makes its way to the domain (thats the only inconsistency that ive seen, i really hope they explain this) so basically the cortana in halo 5 is still cortana but just a corupted version and not her complete self, but still she loves chief.
I really dont like how people jump on the hate bandwagon and say that this game is terrible, when really its quite lore friendly and pushes the story forward. The game is not perfect but saying that its garbage and the worst halo ever is a bit extreme
Edit: now with the new update, halo 5s multiplayer is proving to be truly one of the best.
English
#Gaming
-
8 답변
-
6 답변
-
1 답변Why in gods name would they not just launch a barebones classic playlist with no abilities or clamber? I get why they'd avoid it at launch but now everyone has had plenty of time to fall in love with or hate 343s changes as well as let forgers design the maps for you. I'm sure you could set up a community map tester program and outsource nearly all of the work to the community with only a small internal quality check team.
-
1 답변
-
1 답변ADS. Ground Pound/Slam/Thing. Spartan Charge. Ugly art style. Req packs. Getting random armor. Shit community. That mid-jump boost ability. Feels like CoD and not Halo.
-
1 답변작성자: tuckers baby 12/9/2016 3:03:52 AM[quote]Halo 5 is good!! Prove me wrong[/quote]Simple. Play the campaign. Plus, they're still using that God awful art style from Halo 4.
-
7 답변
-
6 답변My ideal Halo game: -Halo 4's campaign storytelling. -Halo 5's multiplayer. -Halo 3 style maps. -Removal of microtranactions. -Armor quality>quantity. -No duplicate armors, weapons. -Dual wielding. -New content in dlc.
-
9 답변False advertisement of master chief being confirmed dead while Locke would be man hunting him.
-
5 답변Halo 4 had a short, but otherwise okay campaign. It's core player sticked true to Halo with the exception of sprint (I still think it should be a power up, not automatically spawned with). However the multiplayer focused on Infinity game types, where you get loadouts and ordinance drops, thus changing the focus of controlling power weapons to controlling crucial areas of the map, like the Middle on Longbow or the double rooftops on Complex, but had in my opinion the best Big Team Battle. Halo 5 has one of the worst campaigns in Halo. It came with few twists and horrendous writing by Brian Reed. Cortana should've stayed dead and you should've never played as both Locke and the Chief, it should've been one or the other. The multiplayer improved, but had little to offer on launch. Has the best Forge mode. The core mechanics did not feel very Halo-like and everything separate from the campaign looked more plasticky and too much was going on with the armor, even more than Halo 4.
-
1 답변I have liked halo 5 since I first played it. I even really liked the campaign. I am, however, shit at the game sometines, and it makes me not want to play it. But I think 343 [i]mostly[/i] did right by us.
-
5 답변
-
1 답변작성자: T0tal Warri0r 12/7/2016 5:19:49 PM
-
4 답변Those reasons may work for you, but I found much of the game cheesy and boring. The entire story was lacking, and predictable. None of the characters were memorable, or had any development. It honestly felt more like a bad action movie where you get to move the main character occasionally. Lastly the music was disappointing. [spoiler]I know that in many of the other Halo games there wasn't a whole ton of character development, but as a whole the story more than made up for that.[/spoiler]
-
3 답변[quote] I will also present facts as to why its good[/quote] lol you can present facts about the game if you want but whether or not the game is good lies with each individual person
-
4 답변Halo 5 was, in my opinion, a little TOO different. There were some minor things that took away from the halo feel. ADS was one of my biggest concerns, but fortunately they didn't try to shove it down your throat and MAKE you use it. The mandatory thruster pack, while being pretty cool, wasn't the best move either. The changeable armor abilities coincided well with halo's ability to play how you want, and should have stayed. The fact that your team can revive you is neat, but takes away from the lone wolf feel of the others. Even in Reach, your team wasn't ALWAYS with you to hold your hand. Despite these and similar little things, it was a spectacularly well made game. It was gripping, challenging, and overall extremely fun to play. It is definitely deserving of all the praise it receives.
-
1 답변
-
2 답변I didn't get decent internet until after H4 was released, so halos always been about the campaign. I hated having 3 bots tagging along, the warden eternal or whatever he's called was just a lazy, boring and repetitive enemy. I've never been a big fan of the prometheans, as enemies or the lore given in game., whereas I liked fighting covenant and loved fighting the flood. War zone is a good game mode, and kept me interested for a few weeks, but the boss fights get repetitive, there's not a great deal of maps and those req packs suck balls.
-
1 답변[quote]O N L Y U N T I L W E F I N D A W A Y T O F I G H T N L Y U N T I L W E F I N D A W A Y T O F I G H T [/quote]
-
3 답변community got triggered over losing cortana and the story team didnt commit to their decision to kill off an important and largely loved character, so they strung it out another game because of the uproar. bad move. otherwise i quite like it!
-
2 답변I beat every previous halo game on every difficulty, found all the skulls, got all the achievements. I beat Halo 5 on normal once and was done with it.
-
5 답변Wait.... you talking about Halo? Nah man [spoiler]That's Call of Duty 5: Guardians[/spoiler]
-
3 답변작성자: Mongoose 12/6/2016 5:00:25 PM
-
1 답변Lmao no one reads paragraphs.but I can prove you wrong.....the answer is 343.....as long as they are making halo it will always suck....I'm going to go now.... I will leave you a box of tissues
-
1 답변