Racist-check
Socialist-check
Authoritarian(redundant i know)-check
Fascist-check
Liar-check
Criminal-check
Murderer-check
Wants to take guns-check
#hillaryforprison2016
English
#Offtopic
-
18 답변작성자: Archangel 8/31/2016 3:18:21 AMOh god this again... Numerous historical inaccuracies here. First, the assertion that the Third Reich confiscated guns is false. Timeline: -In 1919, German citizens were required to hand in all privately owned firearms, this was done to avoid violating the terms of the treaty of Versailles after Germany's loss in WWI. Hitler came to power in 1933. -In 1928, the Weimar Republic introduced a gun registration system that allowed gun ownership within a strict licensing system. -In 1938, contrary to popular belief, Hitler in reality [b][i]loosened[/i][/b] gun laws significantly, shotguns and rifles were completely deregulated, permit age dropped from 21 to 18, and members of the Third Reich had unlimited access to firearms. Now, they did however take guns from Jews (and others who were deemed "unreliable"), along with pretty much everything else, their livelihoods, properties etc. but it's not only inaccurate, but insensitive to claim the Jews couldn't fight back, because they actually did fight back, over 100 Jewish led uprising took place is every axis controlled territory, most notably would be the Warsaw Ghetto uprising, where 13,000 Jews all revolted, all armed and were essentially annihilated while only managing to inflict 20 casualties to the [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url]. If guns also would've stopped Hitler, they would've before he came to power, not at the hight of his reign, since many violent skirmishes took place. The assertion that the Third Reich were socialist is also false. They were about as much socialist as North Korea is a "Democratic People's Republic". The [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] Party was extremely anti-socialist and anti-communist. Hitler hated socialism and communism, he outlawed both and had anyone associated with the Communist Party executed. It's also asserted that they nationalized corporations and healthcare, but that's also false, Hitler actually protected private businesses and national healthcare in Germany actually dates back to 1883 and Bismarck. With this newfound knowledge, I do hope you carefully consider your sources and know that wherever you learned your inaccurate history from is not to be trusted.
-
1 답변Except that Hillary's being supported by the one thing Hitler hated: rich Jewish dudes.
-
1 답변Oh no Hey OP hey OP hey hey I put this quote on here a lot. "You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be arrogant." -Harlan Ellison
-
1 답변
-
36 답변Lmao. I hate Hillary just as much as the next guy, but this post makes me cringe. Fascist? Lol.
-
1 답변
-
1 답변작성자: AllanChester 8/31/2016 7:15:53 AM
-
7 답변
-
1 답변
-
2 답변[quote]Racist-check Socialist-check Authoritarian(redundant i know)-check Fascist-check Liar-check Criminal-check Murderer-check Wants to take guns-check #hillaryforprison2016[/quote] This post is so false I nearly died
-
10 답변[quote]Criminal-check Murderer-check Wants to take guns-check #hillaryforprison2016[/quote] Innocent until proven guilty-check
-
1 답변
-
작성자: AllanChester 8/31/2016 7:21:20 AMTypical politicians, big promises, but all talk. jump start the economy? What a load of bullshit! All they care about is lining their own pockets. they've got no principles, just like all the rest!
-
7 답변This is more credible than most of the claims that Trump is "literally the next Hitler"