Isn't rumble about score and not number of kills?

So the player that goes for headshots shouldn't win a rumble match because they got less kills vs the person that just melts the guy down not going for the points? If anything, I'd rather give the win to the highest scoring person than the one with more kills. Aiming for a smaller area should be more rewarding than hitting the larger and easier area. Also i want to see the whole match that mtashed was in. Im certain he recorded it right?

[quote]You could have 4 more kills then the guy in first but he would still win, that just makes no sense.[/quote] In basketball, if I score from 2 feet, it's worth 2 points. If I score from 22 ft, it's worth 3. In Golf, the point is not only to put the ball in the cup, but do so in the fewest strokes. In bowling, dropping all 10 pins in one throw yields more points than doing it in 2. See a pattern? You see, the scoring isn't just about killing, it's about [i]how [/i]you killed them. It rewards skill, just as a 3 point shot rewards a more skilled shooter, and a better short game rewards a lower golf score...

How is the rumble point system broken? All of the game modes are like this.

Then all of the point based game modes are broken...

Oh another one who saw mtashed's video