If you are reading this sentence then congratulations, you've passed. You can leave the thread now. You see, i made this thread as a social experiment (and because i'm at school with nothing better to do). I infer that a large majority of people who visit these forums will comment on a thread after reading a title they disagree with, without even reading a single word from the original post. To further ensure that less people will read this, i will type a long wall of text without any paragraphs. This will discourage many people from reading it since it appears so long. If you are still reading then i am very impressed, afterall i have nothing of any importance to say (not that discussing a nerf is even remotely important). But you may find it entertaining to read some of the comments below. Perhaps i am wrong, perhaps i will not get any comments; but if i know this community well enough, i think they will. It may take a couple self bumps, but i am fairly confident that they will bite. Am i a troll? Maybe slightly. But who is worse, me, or someone who will defend there side of an arguement without so much as considering a single point that the other has to make about the subject? I don't give two shits about whether or not if MIDA is nerfed, i just want to see how many people are willing to complain about a title without even reading a single word from the post. It is incredible how bored i can get as a senior in study hall without any work to do... You still reading? I'm quite impressed. This seems like a fairly long wall of text. I've decided to add more to this wall of text as an edit. I shall now start naming fruits and vegetable without commas (don't want anyone to get suspicious). Watermellons strawberries carrots potatos tomatos celery spinach peas cucumber pickles (what's the difference) pumpkins squash lettuce eh, i'm getting bored of typing food. What if i just kept saying things. Like right now? I suppose this works just as well. You know it's quite funny, i probobly look like such a loser now (and rightfully so). But truth be told, the past hour and fifteen minutes have gone by quite quickly. So i would say that i succeded in my goal. Call this weak bait, i don't really care. This post just proves that you don't need good bait. Welp there's the bell. Better turn off my phone now. I suppose this will suffice. Now just in case someone only catches a glimpse of the last couple lines, i will put them in bold and capitalize them. I will also make it sound like i was argueing about Thorn the entire time. I'm willing to bet it will convince a few people. Welp, here it goes. IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THIS GUN IS STUPIDLY OP! ANYONE WHO ARGUES AGAINST IT BEING NERFED IS IN DENIAL THAT THEY SUCK AT PVP AND NEED IT AS A CRUTCH TO DO WELL! NERF THE THORN ALREADY SO THAT PEOPLE WITHOUT SKILL CAN SEE HOW MUCH THEY SUCK WITHOUT IT!!!!
[spoiler]I'm back[/spoiler]
English
#Destiny
-
85 답변
-
You know, no matter what kind of experiment something is, all legitimate experiments require consent. So no, this is not a social experiment, this is "baiting the butt hurt". It's the same reason you can't "pretend" to rob someone and then call it a "prank/social experiment".
-
1 답변
-
2 답변
-
At first I thought this experiment was an interesting idea, but now it's the most annoying thread in the entire forum. It's just people who didn't read the post and then people commenting the same exact thing to everyone in here.
-
To be fair the only problem I see here is you've set out an experiment with the hypothesis that a large majority comment after only reading the title. But then you've sabotaged your results somewhat by writing your post in such a way that less people will read it. Even those that usually would. Biased results are not good results.
-
Wait... If this is a social experiment to see how many people read a post fully to how many just comment dependent on opinion instead of reading, how are you recording that data? How can you tell how many people are just walking away instead of posting? The site tells you how many people liked and commented; not how many that just clicked. And what about those who post sarcastically? If it were x:y where x=how many people actually read, and y=how many people were baited; then you can only obtain an actual number for variable y. X is still unknown isn't it?
-
2 답변Dude says he is in school running a social experiment.... [spoiler] still can't write a paragraph.[/spoiler]
-
2 답변
-
6 답변Top 1% in Crucible and I would say they nerf the fook out of it. The natural aggressive ballistics before the nerf was really annoying, and now it sometimes flinches here and there. Before, it was almost all the time. Do you how to be beat a MIDA? 1. Use one as its not op'd 2. Get up close and personal against someone using a mid to long range weapon 3. Know your facts before posting like this 4. Why nerf everything to the ground, when we can buff weapons until they become somewhat viable but not op'd?
-
3 답변
-
9 답변