{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/23/2016 8:44:13 PM
21
Well, if they do they should limit the smoking of it because any type of smoke is detrimental to your lung development and capacity.
English
-
Wrong [quote]Despite all the medical benefits marijuana has, doctors and scientists have long wondered whether smoking it damages the lungs. After all, if smoking cigarettes, or basically anything else, can damage the lungs, then the smoke from marijuana should as well. But according to a recent study from Emory University, that may not be the case. In a cross-sectional analysis using data from two rounds of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), researchers found that adults aged 18 to 59 who smoked one marijuana cigarette — aka joint — a day were still able to forcibly exhale the same volume of air in one second (known as forced expiratory volume, or FEV1) as someone who didn’t smoke marijuana. Measuring a person’s ability to exhale is called spirometry, and it’s the go-to method for diagnosing respiratory diseases, which impair lung function.[/quote] [url=http://www.medicaldaily.com/smoking-weed-doesnt-harm-lungs-if-its-joint-day-even-after-20-years-318432][/url]
-
[quote]Despite all the medical benefits marijuana has, doctors and scientists have long wondered whether smoking it damages the lungs. After all, if smoking cigarettes, or basically anything else, can damage the lungs, then the smoke from marijuana should as well. But according to a recent study from Emory University, that may not be the case. In a cross-sectional analysis using data from two rounds of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), researchers found that adults aged 18 to 59 who smoked one marijuana cigarette — aka joint — a day were still able to forcibly exhale the same volume of air in one second (known as forced expiratory volume, or FEV1) as someone who didn’t smoke marijuana. Measuring a person’s ability to exhale is called spirometry, and it’s the go-to method for diagnosing respiratory diseases, which impair lung function.[/quote] [url=http://www.medicaldaily.com/smoking-weed-doesnt-harm-lungs-if-its-joint-day-even-after-20-years-318432][/url]
-
[quote]Well, if they do they should limit the smoking of it because any type of smoke is detrimental to your lung development and capacity.[/quote] That's was the original statement made by the OP and this article proves lung development and capacity are as normal as someone who doesn't/hasn't smoked.
-
Lung development and lung capacity are almost the same thing. You need proper lung development to be able to hold the maximum amount of oxygen in your lungs correct? This study states a person who's been smoking a joint a day for 20 years can still exhale the same amount of air in a second as someone who hasn't smoked, to me that suggests proper lung development, capacity, and function.
-
Another thing to look at is marijuana and pregnancy as of now they have no solid evidence to prove that marijuana smoke is taking a negative toll on the fetus where as cigarette smoke or alcohol have been known to disrupt proper growth in the fetus. Again until scientists are allowed to fully study the plant without bias we will never know the real potential of this wonder plant or the devastating truth about the drug it is.
-
Umm okay, there have been thousands of documented medical cases of babies born with developmental issues due to marijuana. I guess there is just no arguing with you. My friend's sister was born addicted to marijuana, maybe it was just a coincidence that her mother smoked marijuana during pregnancy.
-
So as soon as she was 1 years of age she was addicted to smoking weed? Who was supplying her with weed at such a young age? Maybe once she was older she met a group of people who asked her to try it (peer pressure is a real thing) and she liked the feel and continued to smoke it. Or maybe she has an addictive personality and that's the cause for her to become addicted.
-
[quote]No, the point is she had to go through withdrawal, and with the amount of smoke in there house she had stay in the hospital for a couple months.[/quote] So how do you know her mom wasn't also smoking tobacco products or mixing tobacco with her weed (which I'm pretty sure 50% or more people do) and then smoking it? Maybe she was deprived of oxygen? How do you know it was marijuana's fault? I've had groups of friends smoke weed majority of their youth till their early 20's just to stop and quit and still function normally in society. They all workout, play sports, work jobs, finishing university and they aren't coughing up their lungs or depressed everyday.
-
작성자: Immortal Tech 3/24/2016 11:07:58 PMCould you post a link to a study done on the affects of Marijuana on the fetus? And my while my sister was pregnant she had a lot of pregnancy books and one of the chapter was on drugs and their effects on the developing child. It told all about the negatives of smoking cigar/drinking alcohol/even medications but there was maybe half a paragraph on Marijuana. In the little paragraph all it stated was that there wasn't enough research done to prove that Marijuana actually affected the fetus. So again until scientists not from America and not paid by the American government to keep pressing this propaganda we will never know the truth. [quote]Since you were born we controlled what you watched and you read, and soon we're gonna own the fcckin air that you breathe[/quote] -Immortal Technique the Destroyer of Religion. [i]~slowly tips hat and sparks blunt~[/i]
-
Oh yeah I agree with that 100% but the same could be said about usage of any drug, medication, or alcohol in a developing child. Anything could disrupt the developing organs of a child and I see far more parents smoke cigarettes around their children then I do with Marijuana smokers.
