{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
작성자: Obama
3/21/2016 7:27:42 PM
33
FPS vs Graphics WHICH IS BETTER?
Debate, op is straight. Please bump if ya vote?
For example: ps3/xbox 360 playing on unreal engine 4 on highest settings or xbox 1/ps4 playing on frostbite 3 engine with mid graphics.
-
3 답변작성자: Sapphire 3/21/2016 10:42:00 PMForget about wanting a certain number of FPS... I just want a [i]stable[/i] frame rate >.<
-
3 답변
-
2 답변If you play games for FPS and graphics then go to PC and get both. Consoles try to balance both but when they do, they don't go over 60 fps
-
Well it depends on if you are playing a shooter, which depends a lot on fps, or adventure/not a shooter which doesn't. I play my shooters and racers at 1080p above 60fps and all other games at 4k ultra fps will be between 30fps and 90fps depending on game.
-
3 답변작성자: Zack Owned You 3/21/2016 7:24:42 PM
-
7 답변Obvious answer. I could play a game at a majestic graphics setting, but low FPS would ruin it. I usually go for low graphics no matter what to get the highest FPS.
-
3 답변Lets see, i can play a 9000p game with only 1frames per second or i can play a 1p game at 9000 frames per second. One will give you a seizure and the other looks like a slide show
-
1 답변작성자: kingcgh12 3/21/2016 2:12:47 PMDepends on the genre. By picking graphics over fps I'm assuming I'll still get a constant 30fps
-
5 답변
-
7 답변
-
1 답변
-
We're in the "Next Gen" of gaming consoles now, so, why isn't he performance also "Next Gen", We've had PC games running at a smooth 60 FPS for years, yet on console we keep getting the "It's [i]cinematic[/i]" excuse.
-
1 답변
