-
4 답변We need to stop giving criminals more rights than every day citizens... California has a statewide ban on automatic assault rifles. Guess what weapons were used in IRC? AUTOMATIC ASSAULT RIFLES. IT DOESNT WORK. ED 209/WORKS.
-
13 답변Gun control would eliminate mass gun killings?! Wow, that makes so much sense! We should do the same to drugs! That way they will never be used!
-
8 답변You act like if we get gun controll the people doing this shit won't just smuggle guns in or illegally buy them off someone.
-
1 답변Yea cuz it totally the American civilians fault that insane people get guns and shoot people.
-
2 답변작성자: Level 2 on Easy 12/4/2015 4:39:28 PMOh here we go. Once again, meth isn't on the shelves and its highly illegal, yet somehow its everywhere. Gun control solves nothing. Guns are for protection, not anarchy, chaos and the weak-minded.
-
7 답변
-
10 답변
-
32 답변You know what's funny? Chicago has the MOST STRICT gun laws. You know what else they have? [spoiler]the HIGHEST crime rate INVOLVING GUNS! [/spoiler] Proof that gun laws don't work. Crazy people kill people. Not guns. And do you think those CRAZY people are going to obey the laws? Nope! They will get their hands on a gun(s) one way or another.
-
7 답변You know what's ironic? California has extremely strict gun control laws. How about you learn the laws? Places like California, Chicago, and Detroit have insanely tight gun control laws but are also where most of our shootings occur. You don't here about these shootings happening in say Arkansas where constitutional carry is legal. Know why? Because people in the south can and will shoot back. Furthermore in the US guns are used far more to deter crime than to commit it. Firearms, in terms of preventable deaths, also account for very little compared to say tobacco which kills almost half a million each year.
-
3 답변You really want to live in a country where bad men who can and will get their hands on weapons can do whatever they want to unarmed civilians? I sure as hell don't want to unarmed in the face of evil or corruption.
-
6 답변"[i]You guys need proper gun control"[/i] >ignores the fact that 30 round magazines are illegal in California >ignores the fact that the style of rifle used is illegal in California >ignores the fact that they still had bombs even if they hadn't had guns >ignores the fact that this occured in an area that due to gun control no one could shoot back >OP is retard confirmed
-
1 답변Paris has strict gun control. Terrorism doesnt abide by any western civilizations laws and they wreak havoc on anyone and everyone who is not like-minded. This is not a gun control issue. It is a terrorism issue
-
1 답변Btw president Obama has in fact confirmed that the Sam Bordeno shooting was a act of terrorism(ISIS) but says we will prevail. Not sure how to react to this. [spoiler]i can't spell right now forgive me[/spoiler]
-
1 답변
-
7 답변And in other news gun violence in the u.s down but knife stabings on the rise should we have knife control too?
-
14 답변
-
2 답변작성자: BergJager 12/6/2015 1:47:48 PMOn the point of "gun control" and "gun violence" the states with less gun laws, have less crimes relating to firearms. And what the media doesn't tell you is around 50-60% (don't quote the exact number, this is just something I heard) of gun related deaths are suicide, but media will be happy to tell you about all the people killed by guns. What we really need is psychopath control. Edit did some quick research, in 2013 there were 33,636 firearm related deaths, 21,175 of them were suicide, 681 were self defense, and 505 were unintentional (I'm assuming accidental discharge)
-
I have all the facts you need to know. Everyone will die some day so talking about better gun control is pointless. So you can try to have a shit load of fun when you can or you can hide like a pussy. Doesn't matter which you choose cause guess what you're still going to die.
-
Never gonna happen with the gun lobby's fist up the Republican's cornholes. They are fine to sit back and watch our citizens die. Gun control won't solve the issue but will stop some shootings. We need to approach the problem from all angles rather than tying a hand behind our back just because the supreme Court has trouble reading the 2nd amendment as it was intended.