What do you think of it? Personally, I think that he was [i]way[/i] off on some points. He states that the base building feature is unpolished and feels "tacked on". He also states that it lacks a tutorial. Look, I think that if you are intelligent enough to load up the game, then you can easily follow the super user friendly system. It's not that hard... His main criticism was the new dialogue wheel, which he says is watered down and is more casual (same with the leveling system). While this may be the case for the real "hardcore players", I don't think that these things detract much from the game. The voice protagonist made me feel like a real person in the world that others could interact with, and I didn't feel like a mute robot. I absolutely loved the dialogue system though in 3/NV, and I don't have a preference. I think both were executed well, and it comes down to personal preference. He did however point at that the game is buggy, which isn't a surprise. Personally I haven't experienced bugs, and I know many others have/haven't. Depends on your luck. Did you agree with his review? To me, it felt like a weird mixed review.. I honestly couldn't agree with it though, especially when he criticized the graphics. What are your thoughts?
I do agree that the wheel needs more options to tie in with skills, I miss that, but I don't think the actual wheel needs to go now that we have a voiced protagonist.
English
#Gaming
-
20 답변Honestly, I'm just hoping for a new Obsidian-made Fallout at this point. [spoiler]I'm one of those people who much preferred New Vegas to 3. Fight me.[/spoiler]
-
1 답변Haven't watched the video but you're telling me he complained about not having a tutorial and then went on to complain that the game isn't suited for "hardcore gamers" and is too watered down? Hmmm..
-
1 답변
-
3 답변For real my biggest let down was not needing to repair weapons and armor Just like skyrim it's taking out a big piece of the game to drive up sells IMO something Bethesda DID NOT need to do
-
His review didnt seem angry at all, it actually was a happy review with some criticism, and i kind of agree with him. The game isnt well polished, dialogue options are the same always: positive, agressive and sarcastic. And there barely is any tutorial considering the big amount of stuff you can do in the game. Does that make the game bad though? Absolutely not! My first fallout and didnt regret the purchase a single bit, its taking over my life! That though doesnt mean that the game is perfect it has flaws its just still awesome
-
9 답변
-
1 답변The included article every single nail on the head. Worth a read to open your eyes that are glued shut with Pip-Glue
-
1 답변
-
1 답변
-
3 답변>Of all the flaws Fallout 4 has he complains about the building system which is actually well done. AngryJoe Confirmed idiotic, i feel ashamed im from the same country as him. This is coming from someone who loves Fallout 4.
-
12 답변people still watch this guy? a guy who talks utter sh1t so he gets views.. are people seriously that stupid that they can't see his "opinion" is always going to be negative.
-
1 답변
-
6 답변
-
작성자: cardsfan_87 11/23/2015 5:27:51 PMI don't like the dialogue wheel. One option is "sarcastic"? Really? I also don't care much for the sanctuary building, but it's not hard to figure out so he's way off base there. And if the game had made an overtly obvious tutorial he would complain about holding our hands too much. Gamers are too fickle. Seriously.
-
1 답변It's his [b]Opinion[/b] and while I disagree with his, I have to respect that he has one.
-
A friend and I cant continue through the mission where you go into the building after finding the signal of the team that got over ran? You go back to Danse and it says that you cleared the building but doesnt check it off.
-
3 답변I like the fact he didn't give into all the great things people were saying about the game, but I just feel he tried too hard to be "that one reviewer who gave it a low score". It just made him look like he was trying to stand out from the crowd. I gave the game a 9/10, but I still agree with a lot of the cons joe brought up, especially the dialogue system, and even though many of his points were not 100% truthful he is still a trustworthy reviewer