I don't understand how anyone could disagree with gun control. Guns are completely pointless and criminals can't use them if they don't have access to them. Hunting needs to be outlawed and we should definitely outlaw all semi-automatic and fully-automatic weapons. Recreational shooting is just completely retarded and people could use that time to do something productive with their lives.
-
You didn't even provide a viable argument and completely lack any understanding of the issue at hand. I hope you're under the age of ten, because this is the level of argument I would expect from someone so underdeveloped.
-
Good luck with that. Think about it like this. If the government takes our guns, the people will retaliate against a tyrannical government, a.k.a. the government of the US. We will overthrow the government, because guess what? We have an amendment for that.
-
17 답변작성자: everthic 11/3/2015 2:25:45 AMMy only reply to your stupidness in all its anti-glory is this: When have criminals [i]ever[/i] followed the rules? That's what makes them criminals. You think just because they're told no that they'll listen? Wow.
-
3 답변Shooting someone is the answer to everything in the USA. Your all a bunch of retards. What ever happened to the good old days when you could have a punch up and then shake each others hand. Thats how real men do it. You lot are worse than ISIS.
-
2 답변작성자: Just No 11/3/2015 1:49:28 PMThe criminals will start using knives. And if we have no guns we can't defend ourselves from the criminals if they come to our houses. Some people hunt for their own food... Using guns. They are necessary and our constitutional right to use them and if we use them for wrong we get shot ourselves. So you hippies better stop trying to take my guns. *sips hot chocolate* P.S. Taking guns would just be the start. Then other rights would follow and war would occur. This is a constitutional republic not China.
-
4 답변
-
작성자: pmbannedIcy 11/3/2015 1:59:14 PMWell I don't think calling people something as politically incorrect as retarded, but you can do whatever you want. I'm not sure wether you thought about the fact that if no one in the US has gun, assuming it goes your way, and guns [i]will[/i] be smuggled in. No one will have a gun to defend themselves and by the time cops get there they will likely be many injuries or deaths. I personally shoot guns both recreationally and I also hunt. It's fun to go out and shoot targets with friends and to going out wait and shoot a deer to eat and if you get a nice one mount the head. I remember when my dad took me to go hunting for the first time not knowing if I'd like it. Soon we were going every chance we had. It became a great bonding experience for both of us. People are going to get their guns taken away without a fight. Here's what someone said that I agree with. Problems with your arguments: 1: criminals won't have access to them. Fun fact: heroin is banned. Another fun fact: heroin is still one of the most used substances in America. Same with guns. 2: hunting should be outlawed. Why? If you say it is cruel then I present two options, A: Deer thrive in central North America, and then are culled by their only predator in the region, humans. This means a quick and painless death. Or B: thousands of deer starve to death for lack of resources over weeks, and due to this all other herbivores in the environment suffer as well. Hunting still animal cruelty? Probably not, bud. And 3: recreational shooting is pointless. So are all other recreational things. You think surfing should be outlawed because it doesn't help anyone. How about knitting? What about boxing? All outlawed as it isn't productive! That is just silly.
-
Same logic as the war on drugs then right? Make it criminal and it just goes away? Tell that to the thousands hooked on meth and heroin in this country. There is already gun control in place. You cant walk in to the deli for a pound and a half of ham and a .357 s&w. You go to a store, apply for a permit, and wait for it to be accepted to pick up your LEGAL firearm. In the blackmarket, you bring a few hundred to a guy on a corner and he brings back a hot piece w the serials shaved. Anyone who acts like making it harder for people to pick them up legally is going to make things better needs to take their mouth off the tailpipe. Such retard
-
For one banning guns will not stop criminals for owning guns. The only thing it will do is leave the good citizens helpless like they already are. Hunting has absolutely nothing to do with why we should have gun control and recreational shooting is just as pointless as say gaming or watching tv so that point is stupid as well.
-
5 답변
-
작성자: JoeMamasfat 11/3/2015 1:07:46 AMWe already have firearm control already in place. If you impose stricter laws and regulations, it is rather easy around them. All you would be doing is disarming the law-abiding citizens. Ever heard of TOR and the dark web? If not, then prepare to excrete bricks. I could have firearms (both of the legal and illegal veriety) delivered to me, no questions asked. To further prove that stricter regulations will not work; Chicago and DC. If the strictest of regulations were put in place back with our founding fathers, then yes, it would work. But it's far too late.
-
It seems that most people don't understand what gun control is. Nobody is taking your guns away. You just have to get a background check. If you don't have a mental deficiency or a criminal record, you get to keep your guns same as before.
-
1 답변Already have too much gun control. Time to get rid of the nonsensical, unnecessary laws like the ones restricting barrel length, overall length, and suppressors while more strictly enforcing the remaining already existing laws.
-
I have no words other than you are completely out of it. Wake up. Guns are people's rights to own. For our own protection so that we don't get killed. Can you imagine if someone broke into your home and you didn't have a gun to protect yourself from dying?