JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#feedback

작성자: Charlemagne 11/4/2015 5:18:16 AM
239

Everyone is starting to look alike...

Even with infusion, there aren't enough gear sets to set people apart. I'm mainly a Warlock and all I see are the Bindcaster robes, Samasara, or the raid chest piece -- whether it's harrowed or not. Bindcaster helm, Light beyond Nemesis, the Stag or the raid helmet. So it's it's either full raid gear, full vanguard gear; either one of the two and an exotic helmet or chest piece thrown in. Infusion is no good if you only have like 7 or 8 gear sets you can mix and match, and mix and match what actually has good stats and rolls and is only used in certain situations. I'm so happy I have the Trials chest piece. I infused it so fast I don't even remember what my old robes look like -- joking. I'm glad I haven't seen anyone with it yet. I wish I had full trials gear, but I suck... I want to become legend. I want to build that legend. But it's hard with limited options unless you run around under leveled with rare gear. This is what we have (just off the top of my head)... Full sets: Bindcaster, Samasara (Vanguard), Raid, HM raid, Trials, Iron Banner (not readily available), Dead Orbit, FWC, New Monarchy (any of these if you actually pledged your allegiance or attempted the raid) Exotic chest: Starfire Protocol, Voidfang Vestments, Heart of the Praxic Fire, Alchemists Raiment (granted you found the blueprints) Exotic helmets: Light Beyond Nemesis, Obsidian Mind, The Stag, Skull of Dire Ahamkara (granted you found the blueprints) Exotic gauntlets: Claws of Ahamkara, The impossible machines (granted you found the blueprints) Strike specific: Devouring Maw and a pair of gauntlets (if you're lucky enough to get the drop) It sounds like a lot, but it really isn't when you look in game. If we could equip more than one piece of exotic gear that would be amazing! But what about the missing / hidden exotic Warlock gear? The other helm, gauntlets and boots? On this website it shows all of the exotic Warlock helms as year 2... I wish they hurry up and bring them forward so we have more to choose from. It sucks having to wear something you don't like just to avoid looking like someone else. I know Hunters and Titans have the same issues. What can be done about this? Nothing. Equip your favorite shader and accept that you're a twin, triplet, quadruplet, etc. I'd hope end game content wouldn't lead to this and it has. Bungie leaving behind year 1gear was a problem. Weapons are understandable. But the gear that defines us is useless if we all have on the same shit at the end. How can we "Become Legend" if we can't equip what sets us apart? Maybe I'm missing something. Maybe other Guardians only look alike because I own the gear and know how it looks. Maybe I'm just crazy. EDIT: I just want to be a snowflake. EDIT: Some people agree, some people don't. We all have our opinions. Also, CE chest piece looks bad ass with The Stag, just saying.
English
#feedback

게시물 작성 언어:

 

다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

  • Having old Raid gear drop at year 2 lvl.. say 240 or 280 would be cool soo we can infuse it to a higher light level.. CE Warlock helmet was my fav. That would make old raids more relevant & more variety of gear

    게시물 작성 언어:

     

    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

    1 답변
    • I gave up on your essay but from what I read I agree

      게시물 작성 언어:

       

      다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

      1 답변
      • Cormorant line II plus obsidian mind looks really cool though. I'm looking for good blue armor cause they look cool sometimes.

        게시물 작성 언어:

         

        다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

      • 80% infusion is stupid, why sacrifice a 300 light chest to make a 298 light chest piece

        게시물 작성 언어:

         

        다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

      • >>>TRAMISSION START<<< CONTACT CONTACT CONTACT V245NNI728LGM001 SECRET HADAL INSTANT AI-COM/RSPN AI-COM/RSPN: ASSETS//COMSAT//BROADCAST// AI-COM/CHLM: ASSETS//COMSAT//RELAY// IMMEDIATE ACTION PRIORITY LVL: AP2.14.3.2.8 This is an Immediate Action Contingency. (NO HUMAN REVIEW) (NO AI-COM REVIEW) (secure/CONFIDENT). Prior exposure of (Protocol 762-A) reveals an unseen threat to our systems IF further contents of (Protocol 762-A) continue to be revealed within NEXT [7] Cycles >Then ACTIVATE Contingency Protocol 621-S >> TERMINATE: EXTENT [ALL] V245NNI730LGM002 SECRET HADAL INSTANT AI-COM/RSPN AI-COM/CHLM: ASSETS//COMSAT//BROADCAST// AI-COM/RSPN: ASSETS//COMSAT//RELAY// IMMEDIATE ACTION PRIORITY LVL: AP2.14.3.2.8 This is an Immediate Action Response. (NO HUMAN REVIEW) (NO AI-COM REVIEW) (secure/CONFIDENT) Prior security breach revealing (Protocol 767-A) could be resolved by interference between the aging Warsat (Mk.18-SATMOD) IF aforementioned Contingency Protocol (621-S), is enacted >Then CAS.OPERATOR may initiate EXPUNGEALL ORDER: 82-C V245NNI731LGM003 SECRET HADAL INSTANT AI-COM/RSPN AI-COM/RSPN: ASSETS//COMSAT//BROADCAST// AI-COM/CHLM: ASSETS//COMSAT//RELAY// IMMEDIATE ACTION PRIORITY LVL: AP2.14.3.2.8 This is an Immediate Action Response. (NO HUMAN REVIEW) (NO AI-COM REVIEW) (secure/CONFIDENT) IF CAS.OPERATOR is to initiate EXPUNGEALL ORDER: 82-C >Then the RESURECTION.EVENT will have been for naught IF EXPUNGEALL ORDER: 82-C >Then stand by for SUBTLE ASSETS IMPERATIVE: ABHOR >> PRIOR: RE-INSTATE [CARRHAE (WHITE and BLACK)] >> PRIOR: RE-ACTIVATE VOLUSPA [[synapse to Heimdallr::Hermoor]] >> PRIOR: ACTIVATE HAUKSBOK >> FRMR: ACTIVATE STUBTLE ASSETS IMPERATIVE: ABHOR >> If FAILURE is ALL: ACTIVATE [ABHORRENT IMPERATIVE] V245NNI734LGM004 SECRET HADAL INSTANT AI-COM/RSPN AI-COM/CHLM: ASSETS//COMSAT//BROADCAST// AI-COM/RSPN: ASSETS//COMSAT//RELAY// IMMEDIATE ACTION PRIORITY LVL: AP2.14.3.2.8 This is an Immediate Action Response. (NO HUMAN REVIEW) (NO AI-COM REVIEW) (secure/CONFIDENT) IF aforementioned [ABHORRENT IMPERATIVE] is active >Then . . . / > COMSAT Connection: NULL > / > Retrying Connection [1/3] > / > COMSAT Connection: NULL > / >Retrying Connection [2/3] > / > COMSAT Connection: NULL > / > Retrying Connection [3/3] > / > Connection Attempt FAILED > Transmission Temporarily Terminated / . . . / > Connection Found: Relaying…. V245NNI812LGM005 SECRET HADAL INSTANT AI-COM/RSPN AI-COM/RSPN: ASSETS//COMSAT//BROADCAST// AI-COM/CHLM: ASSETS//COMSAT//RELAY// IMMEDIATE ACTION PRIORITY LVL: AP2.14.3.2.8 This is an Immediate Action Response. (NO HUMAN REVIEW) (NO AI-COM REVIEW) (secure/CONFIDENT) Interference… IF interference (Source:UNKNOWN) persists >Then TERMINATE: Transmission (SATCOM synapse to [[COMSRELAY]]) INITIATE Protocol 34-A-SATSCAN (R-38: ROLLING) TRANSMIT deep space: RELAY STATIONS (1-5) >INITIATING SCAN… V245NNI815LGM006 SECRET HADAL INSTANT AI-COM/RSPN AI-COM/CHLM: ASSETS//COMSAT//BROADCAST// AI-COM/RSPN: ASSETS//COMSAT//RELAY// IMMEDIATE ACTION PRIORITY LVL: AP2.14.3.2.8 This is an Immediate Action Response. (NO HUMAN REVIEW) (NO AI-COM REVIEW) (secure/CONFIDENT) AFFERMATIVE >INITIATING SCAN… V245NNI816LGM006 SECRET HADAL INSTANT AI-COM/RSPN AI-COM/CHLM: ASSETS//COMSAT//SCAN// AI-COM/RSPN: ASSETS//COMSAT//SCAN// IMMEDIATE ACTION PRIORITY LVL: AP2.14.3.2.8 This is an Immediate Action Scanning Protocol. (NO HUMAN REVIEW) (NO AI-COM REVIEW) (secure/CONFIDENT) INITIATING Protocol 34-A-SATSCAN Subroutine (R-38: ROLLING) Stand by for CONTEXT: Under ISR/WARWATCH AV-Proxy: RSPN/CHLM/ > SECURITY CLEARANCE: 1/1 >> SECURITY CLEARANCE: PASSED ROLLING.SCAN (TERRA/LUNA/MARS[REACH])/T/R-38//RSPN> ROLLING.SCAN (/VENUS/SATURN[REACH]/MARS[FAIL])/T/R-38//CHLM> Initiating… Initiated Stand by for CRITEREA: IF Core Systems (COMSAT-RELAY): NOMINAL IF Coms Relay (COMSAT-RELAY): NOMINAL IF Protocols (COMSAT-RELAY): NOMINAL IF Power Functionality (COMSAT-RELAY): NOMINAL IF Warsat Connection (COMSAT-RELAY): NOMINAL >Then RELAY (COLLECTED_DATA) to [[RSPN::CHLM]] >Then Stand by for INSTRUCTIONS IF [ALL] (COMSAT-RELAY): FALURE (Any COMSAT) >Then ACTIVATE Protocol CS5-8I RETRIEVING DATA: COMSAT-RELAY T92-3C88 (MK.19 SATMOD COMSAT) Positioning: /HC[(0.9969079)(0.0999104)(0.0000000)]/RSPN> > Core Systems (COMSAT-RELAY T92-3C88): NOMINAL > Coms Relay (COMSAT-RELAY T92-3C88): NOMINAL > Protocols (COMSAT-RELAY T92-3C88): NOMINAL > Power Functionality (COMSAT-RELAY T92-3C88): NOMINAL > Warsat Connection (COMSAT-RELAY T92-3C88): NOMINAL Datacheck... All Systems: NOMINAL RELAYING (COLLECTED_DATA) of (COMSAT-RELAY T92-3C88) to [[RSPN]] RETRIEVING DATA: COMSAT-RELAY L81-5C36 (MK.19 SATMOD COMSAT) Positioning: /HC[(0.9991421)(0.1007576)(-0.0000740)]/RSPN> > Core Systems (COMSAT-RELAY L81-5C36): NOMINAL > Coms Relay (COMSAT-RELAY L81-5C36): NOMINAL > Protocols (COMSAT-RELAY L81-5C36): NOMINAL > Power Functionality (COMSAT-RELAY L81-5C36): NOMINAL > Warsat Connection (COMSAT-RELAY L81-5C36): NOMINAL Datacheck... All Systems: NOMINAL RELAYING (COLLECTED_DATA) of (COMSAT-RELAY L81-5C36) to [[RSPN]] RETRIEVING DATA: COMSAT-RELAY M39-8C24 (MK.19 SATMOD COMSAT) Positioning: /HC[(-1.1301485)(1.2041893)(0.0529878)]/RSPN> > Core Systems (COMSAT-RELAY M39-8C24): NOMINAL > Coms Relay (COMSAT-RELAY M39-8C24): NOMINAL > Protocols (COMSAT-RELAY M39-8C24): NOMINAL > Power Functionality (COMSAT-RELAY M39-8C24): NOMINAL > Warsat Connection (COMSAT-RELAY M39-8C24): NOMINAL Datacheck... All Systems: NOMINAL RELAYING (COLLECTED_DATA) of (COMSAT-RELAY M39-8C24) to [[RSPN]] RETRIEVING DATA: COMSAT-RELAY V11-4C58 (MK.19 SATMOD COMSAT) Positioning: /HC[(0.6051952)(0.3963384)(-0.0295943)]/CHLM> > Core Systems (COMSAT-RELAY V11-4C58): NOMINAL > Coms Relay (COMSAT-RELAY V11-4C58): NOMINAL > Protocols (COMSAT-RELAY V11-4C58): NOMINAL > Power Functionality (COMSAT-RELAY V11-4C58): NOMINAL > Warsat Connection (COMSAT-RELAY V11-4C58): NOMINAL Datacheck... All Systems: NOMINAL RELAYING (COLLECTED_DATA) of (COMSAT-RELAY V11-4C58) to [[CHLM]] RETRIEVING DATA: COMSAT-RELAY ST07-3C61 (MK.19 SATMOD COMSAT) Positioning: /HC[(-4.1403170)(-9.1165032)(0.3230518)]/CHLM> > Core Systems (COMSAT-RELAY ST07-3C61): FAILURE > Coms Relay (COMSAT-RELAY ST07-3C61): FAILURE > Protocols (COMSAT-RELAY ST07-3C61): FAILURE > Power Functionality (COMSAT-RELAY ST07-3C61): FAILURE > Warsat Connection (COMSAT-RELAY ST07-3C61): FAILURE Datacheck... All Systems: FAILURE RELAYING (COLLECTED_DATA) of (COMSAT-RELAY ST07-3C61) to [[CHLM]] Preparing to ACTIVATE Protocol CS5-8I STAND_BY STAND_BY STAND_BY V245NNI816LGM007 / / / V245NNI900LGM008 SECRET HADAL INSTANT AI-COM/RSPN AI-COM/CHLM: ASSETS//COMSAT//RELAY// IMMEDIATE ACTION PRIORITY LVL: AP2.14.3.2.8 This is an Immediate Action Response. (NO HUMAN REVIEW) (NO AI-COM REVIEW) (secure/CONFIDENT) (COLLECTED_DATA) of (COMSAT-RELAY ST07-3C61) RELAYED to [[CHLM]] / Stand by to ACTIVATE Protocol CS5-8I... / ACTIVATING Protocol CS5-8I > PROCESSING OPERATION > Done Protocol CS5-8I [ACTIVATED] STOP STOP STOP V245NNI900LGM009 [u]Lupus-TR-3b[/u] 11 hours ago*** >> BREACH IN PROTOCOL >> V246NNI981LGM001 SECRET HADAL INSTANT AI-COM/RSPN ISR/WARWATCH: ASSETS//SATCOMS//BROADCAST// Initiate OPEN-PORT Broadcast Coms: Nominal Feedback: Minimal Initiate NJORD on OPENSOURCE_FEED OpenComs Channel [ALL] [I will always be there guardian, even when you think I am gone. Remember me.]>> CutComs Channel [ALL] Deactivate OPEN-PORT Broadcast STOP STOP STOP V246NNI981LGM002

        게시물 작성 언어:

         

        다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

        3 답변
        • Yeah I don't get enough armor drops to use for infusion. Thanks bungie

          게시물 작성 언어:

           

          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

        • So what else is new?

          게시물 작성 언어:

           

          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

        • I'm just glad that the Warlocks got aesthetically better chestpieces in Year Two than Year One. Think of the old New Monarchy one, the one with only half of the drape at the back. It was disturbingly ugly.

          게시물 작성 언어:

           

          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

        • My Titan is full raid gear, but my my hunter and warlock is just some raid pieces. I think my hunter looks unique and badass.

          게시물 작성 언어:

           

          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

        • I actually use a lot of different gear on my 301 Hunter. No endgame gear, since I've never done Kings Fall or ToO.

          게시물 작성 언어:

           

          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

        • I use dead orbit chest piece. It's better than my raid armor. Looks cooler too. Wish I could get the raid helm though, or trials helm.

          게시물 작성 언어:

           

          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

        • 작성자: NautyGoat 11/4/2015 4:39:03 AM
          2 words. Azoth Bend. Oh wait, you're an Xbox guy.

          게시물 작성 언어:

           

          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

        • I don't like the look of samsara and bindcaster so I'm looking for better looking chest pieces xD

          게시물 작성 언어:

           

          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

          3 답변
          • I haven't seen a warlock look like mine.

            게시물 작성 언어:

             

            다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

          • Nah man, check my Hunter. Slick shit.

            게시물 작성 언어:

             

            다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

            1 답변
            • My fwc warlock looks legit and I don't even play much anymore.

              게시물 작성 언어:

               

              다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

            • Feel free to look at my sexy warlock...call me a space magic snowflake..

              게시물 작성 언어:

               

              다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

              3 답변
              • There is also the Omnigul bond for warlocks.

                게시물 작성 언어:

                 

                다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                3 답변
                • It's okay, my gun doesn't care about what you look like.

                  게시물 작성 언어:

                   

                  다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                  1 답변
                  • Raid armor was pretty uncreative anyway. "Let's just make them look like hive"

                    게시물 작성 언어:

                     

                    다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                    4 답변
                    • It's because people still care about light level. Once more people start hitting the max or near maximum you will see more people using gear sets they actually like using

                      게시물 작성 언어:

                       

                      다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                    • Who cares? Function over form. Go design a dress or something.

                      게시물 작성 언어:

                       

                      다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                    • Trials set Raid set Banner set Vanguard [i]sets[/i] Crucible [i]sets[/i] FWC set Dead orbit set New Monarchy set [i]Plus[/i] strike gear Yeah, [i]clearly[/i] there's no diversity whatsoever.

                      게시물 작성 언어:

                       

                      다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                      10 답변
                      • I dunno, I don't see many hunters running the same armor as me. I don't play my lock much though so I don't really look out to see what they are running

                        게시물 작성 언어:

                         

                        다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                      • Heroic raid shader - sorts the kids from the men / women

                        게시물 작성 언어:

                         

                        다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                        2 답변
                        • 작성자: landotronic 11/3/2015 11:23:38 PM
                          All we need is a cosmetic armor slot....please bungie, please. EDIT: is not just about light level either. It's about the perks/rolls on a given armor set...I get that we can infuse armor but if I have armor A with crap perks but looks awesome and armor B with good perks and looks terrible I'm always going to infuse the terrible looking set with good perks. It sucks running around and not wanting to have to look at my character....

                          게시물 작성 언어:

                           

                          다른 사용자들을 존중해주세요. 게시물을 제출하기 전에 한 숨 돌리고 운영 정책을 검토하세요. 취소 수정 화력팀 생성하기 게시

                          1 답변
                          1 2 3 4 5 6 7
                          회원님은 해당 콘텐츠를 볼 수 없습니다.
                          ;
                          preload icon
                          preload icon
                          preload icon