[u][i][b]NOTICE: Any comment that breaks Bungie's Terms of Service agreement will reported. This goes doubly so for the people who think that using homosexual terms as an insult is perfectly acceptable.[/b][/i][/u] We have paid $140 for what was originally intended to be $60. It was Bungie's, not Activision's, idea to throw micro-transactions at the player. It seems about half of The Taken King was actually cut for that $40 price tag too. Isn't it time people stop supporting this game? For those who deem to read things at face value I'll point out what the article says in a non-politically correct fashion. The article reads of a power hungry, self-serving Jason Jones who insisted that a completed game be converted into an "open world" game that was "non-linear" (the exact opposite of what Bungie's known for) because those were the big buzz words floating around circa 2013 that all the huge games were using. Those Bungie employees who didn't like his attitude quit or got fired (Staten, O'Donnell, and half the Halo team) right when the story changed. Jones then said "Well, we have a cool looking room here and a good boss fight here so let's find a way to connect it to this area here and call it a mission." They then recycled all the existing assets and threw out a game in the span of a year that was rubbish, all while lying to the consumer. [u][i][b]NOTICE: Any comment that breaks Bungie's Terms of Service agreement will reported. This goes doubly so for the people who think that using homosexual terms as an insult is perfectly acceptable.[/b][/i][/u]