Seeing as you have k/d of 1.0 on your Titan and 1.1 on your Hunter [i]and[/i] you didn't play your Titan in Iron Banner... I just can't take you seriously.
How would you know what's OP when most of your opponents are better than you?
Oh, and one of us played them both to rank five. FoP on that thought.
English
-
Wow. Childish. I expeced more from you. Because I didn't play iron banner with my titan I don't know how it works???? And for me personally the titan is my least favorite character by far. So no that won't be my first choice to rank it up to 5. Especially with all the hammers flying around. After I got the pulse rifle i was done. Iron banner was not fun this time. Also because of the quiver thing. And because there are pvp players that are better then me I don't know how the game works? You just told me my kd was 1.1 So most players are not better then me. Not that your point made any sense even if my kd was 0.30.
-
Lost Sols makes a good point. That majority of people complaining about SBs and those who complained about thorn were barely average to below average players in PvP. No disrespect but you barely break even when you play PvP. I could see your point if you had tons of wins or were in the top 10% or higher in multiple PvP categories on Destiny Tracker but that's not the case. The fact is Bungie has nerfed weapons in the past based on complaints and not enough data. There was nothing wrong with Thorn. It was overused and popular because bungie nerfed ARs into the ground. Yet it could still be beat buy other weapons in the right hands. Red Death, Midi in the right hands, and the TLW up close among others. I used Thorn since before it got popular and got beat by other players with these weapons. Instead of being objective about it and making ARs viable again while leaving everything else alone they listened to all the complainers like you and nerfed the whole weapon class to hell. If anything all HCs needed were a range nerf and that's it. As Lost Sols pointed out the same thing is happening with SB's hammers. People who can't adapt to it are complaining that it's OP without trying to find ways to counter it. I main a Titan and when I hear the hammer I run unless I have something to counter it with. I have stated in several other posts that SB's in super are NOT impossible to bring down. I have killed them with shotgun + melee with No Back Up Plans on a def Titan. A machine gun. FOH with unstoppable. Nova bombs, and high impact snipes to head. Despite what others are saying about not being able to head shot snipe them out of super it is in fact possible. I've had it done to me along with all of the above. Another thing people aren't taking into account is armor perks that lessen elemental damage. As you got hammered did you happen to look at what the guys who killed you were wearing and what the perks were? I doubt it. I wear a chest piece that lessens solar damage when I see lots of players using solar damage supers or weapons. Also certain weapons give armor increase like Boolean. How do you know that certain SBs didn't have the buff active just before or during their super. It stacks up to three times last up to 15 seconds or more. That said, it's essential that Bungie understand balance based more on data and not player hyperbole or complaints. I'm frustrated with needless nerfs like what happened to Thorn. HOL is not OP. Just adapt to it and deal with it. Oh and for the record. I have an overall KD of 1.34 across all my characters. I have two titans and a warlock. I used to have a hunter but deleted it because I don't like the way they played and think and have distinct advantages in PvP that Bungie hasn't addressed. Example no one is complaining about people spamming shade step when it should have a more noticeable cool-down. I mostly play rumble and my KD there is 1.6 - 1.7. I've won over 530 rumble matches mostly as a striker and over all win some 30+% of my rumble matches. So I feel I can speak objectively about it. Also I've gone to the lighthouse every week on usually 2-3 characters and win almost 70% of my trials matches.
-
This. She (I assume bc 3 female chars) hasn't even used the titan in PvP since right after ttk came out... almost a month since used in PvP... you know, before people even had a chance to adapt to the HoS. Hers is an example of an emotionally-driven op perception. Its equivalent to the difference between saying Crota is difficult on the first night it came out and the perceived difficulty after we all learned the mechanics a week or three in. Just my opinion.
-
Yo sols. It's easy to reply when there's just to talk about anedoctes, right? I used coiled hiss and got positive, I killed a sunbreaker with melees, I won every match with just no land beyond... when you got some decent arguments, feel free to come at my post. Bye~
-
작성자: Lost Sols 10/21/2015 11:53:21 AMROFL. Your post was moronic and infantile. Anyone with a k/d above 1.5 should have no issues facing anything they go against. You're just another person who can't stand when someone gets the better of you so you cry nerf. Also, though I'm not sure your mind can grasp this, there are basically 3 archetypes for each weapon class. High RoF/Low Impact Low RoF/High Impact Mid RoF/Mid Impact Most weapon variations are aesthetic. Coiled Hiss was the EXACT SAME as 123 Syzygy Oversoul Edict Praedyth's Timepiece Skorri's Revenge Grasp of Malok The only variations are look, perks and starting stability and reload. I had 123, Skorri's and Oversoul and NONE had the stability of the vendor Coiled Hiss. Just like all the Hung Jury twins can't touch its starting stats for Scouts in TTK, Coiled Hiss was the perfect Pulse Rifle. Coiled Hiss could also be rolled Full Auto. I never got one with it, but I did get 3rd Eye on one and it was amazing. And Pulse Rifles were buffed in 1.1.1, but they were already able to hold their own pre-buff. All the buff did was make them destroy Thorn that caused so many of your tears. Vanilla Pulse Rifles were awful because all the legendaries were dirt slow RoF. One last thing. If you want to come talk sh*t, next time have something at least semi-intelligent to say or at least interesting.
-
>Anyone with a k/d above 1.5 should have no issues facing anything they go against. You're just another person who can't stand when someone gets the better of you so you cry nerf. 1.5 k/d ensues => no issues facing anything they go against, therefore => You're just another person who can't stand when someone gets the better of you so you cry nerf. Anyone that can read and have the smallest logical skill can see how wrong this is on so many levels. And you're an actual retarded just to conceive this idiotic conclusion. Now I don't give a shit about thorn and sunbreakers, just tell me how you deduced that a k/d of 1.5 (from the moment you used the k/d it was clear you were a total retard but whatever, you didn't even specify which k/d and also WHY in the hell 1.5 should be the minimum requirement, you just chose a random value without considering the implication where k/d is PURELY RELATIVE, all arbitrarily shit because you have no idea what you're talking about) ensues that there's NO ISSUES FACING ANYTHING. Seriously? Really? By this logic I should win every single match, on the other hand I have 1.7 of k/d. The fact is this is just wrong from the beginning and I'm not sure how to explain properly why. As I can't explain a colour to a blind man, I can't explain logic to an idiot. At this point I'd talk about the gem that is your conclusion after all these absolutely wrong inferences (seriously what a combo lmao), but I'm not sure your mind can grasp that. I'm waiting for a reply where you explain in which way your argument (the one I just talked about obviously, don't even try to change subject like you did with that pointless coiled hiss) should be correct. I'm curious.
-
Come on sols, I know you're reading, don't make the party end. I'm still curious about in which way you think your bullshit should be correct. Or maybe it isn't like... it's actually bullshit you persist to pretend it's right for some self-absorbed reasons? Prove I'm wrong explaining the logic of your statements. If your mind can grasp this, but I'm not sure :)
-
Yup honestly I wasn't expecting a clever answer at this point rotfl. In case I made some mistakes, sorry. English is not my first language. Now what about avoiding to change subject and actually explain your bullshit?
-
Nobody was talking about having issues facing anything. I don't know why you would start about that. It's completely irrelevant. If you can beat a sunbreaker or not isn't the point. The point about that particular super is it outclasses all other supers big time.
-
작성자: Bacherizator 10/22/2015 4:21:56 AMJesus, phuckin, christ... Such a disappointment. Don't even sure which reply I should pick. I'll go fallacyman. Other than all the billions of fallacies you had fun spreading all over your pointless words, like the hominems and that hilarious conclusion where I might be just another crybaby of this forum; the umpteenth anecdotal and that even more hilarious half-strawman (can't believe you did wrong even a fallacy rotfl), you actually missed the whole point in a marvelous way. I said the coiled hiss argument doesn't prove anything, and just after that you came out with an ENTIRE post on it. Amazing. You're actually [i]that[/i] retarded. Honestly, I don't see even one reason to go further with this conversation, from the moment it's like you didn't actually gave me a real reply, according to all the fallacies you committed. Now read your last sentencies and change the subject.