Why don't creationist worship god just in case? It's a win win situation. If they die and nothing happened, good. If it turns out there is a god they wouldn't go to hell lol.

It doesn't matter what people believe now. In 1000 years, either humanity will have destroyed itself, or all these scientific theories (which are supported by evidence, not just wishful thinking) will be proven correct, and we will have full control over every aspect of our biological world(and certainly more than just biology), and religions will be a relic of the past. Despite the christian church trying so hard to hold science back, it has progressed exponentially in all fields, while religion still clings to the same basic faith, ignorance and fear it always has. Enjoy your stagnant beliefs system, where you trade money for feeling better about yourself, while the church gets rich and exploits peoples needs using your money. As for evolution... I will use the most common argument christians use. Prove it doesnt exist. There is more supporting evidence that evolution, as it is defined, is accurate.

If there was a college for blatant ignorance, you would graduate as valedictorian. Firstly, I will deal with your post, and then supply evidence of my own; something Creationists lack. "Shout out to all the Creationists putting up with the evolutionists lack of evidence." Oh my God, the irony is so real, Lord Saladin just killed himself. Evolution is backed by a vast amount of information, while Creationism is pure, blind faith. Give me ONE piece of evidence towards Creationism, just ONE, and I will listen to you. Don't even start with "statistical chance". You know what else has very low "statistical chance"? You being alive. You were the one out of 250,000 sperm from your father to reach the womb first. This increases exponentially as we go back through your ancestry. Eventually, we hit the 1 in one pentillonth of a chance that you are here, and even further than that! So, just don't even bother with "statistical chance". Carbon Dating isn't the ONLY technique used. It only goes back about 50,000 years or so. Uranium Dating is what is used for millions and billions of years. You have NO idea what evolution is about if you think macroevolution is about "dogs turning into whales" and "apes turning into a man". Macroevolution HAS been observed, with fossilized remnants of ancestry. There are fossils of of transitionary animals. It would take you five minutes to Google transitionary fossils, but for some reason, I doubt you have done that. You're right, interspecies mating does not produce a hybrid of the two. This is completely irrelevant to macroevolution. Again, you have no idea what you are talking about. No faith is required to understand evolution, just a functional brain. Alright, now how about evidence? I'll use your format that you are so smug about. A. Fossilized Records 1. They show the beginning, present, and most of the middle. Arcaeologists are finding more fossils all of the time, not a single one has yet to contradict evolution. Again, a simple Google search would provide all of your answers. B. Genetics 1. Every animal has a specific genetic code, but they all have concepts from the same "genetic alphabet", per say. In order for this to occur, they would all have to have the same ancestor. I learned this from 10th grade Biology; basic stuff. C. Embryos 1. Many animals have indistinguishable embryos, such as the hippo, frog, and rabbit. This shows that animals are similar and develop similarly, therefore implying they are related and have a common ancestor. D. Adaptation and Geography 1. Animals adapt to their surroundings, denying this is stupidity at its finest. Cacti can survive in the desert because they adapted to the low amount of water, while something like a fern would die fast since it is not adapted to the desert. Bats spend most of their time flying through dark caves, so they adapted echolocation, which gives them to ability to maneuver easily, while a human would have a much harder time. Fish have adapted to surviving underwater with gills, while most land creatures would drown. Adaptation is the stepping stone to evolution. If you are so ignorant that you want more, feel free to ask. So there it is, evolution. It has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. It is no longer a question of whether or not you BELIEVE in it, it is a question of whether or not you KNOW it exists.

Never mind. I (probably) read the original post incorrectly, I feel like a jerk now. I was considering removing the post, but that would make me look even worse than I am now. The least I can do is down vote this post, and I will provide my reasoning as to why evolution is not fact, no matter what your science teacher will tell you, even if they have to teach it. Think about this, as OP had said (and my sincerest apology, I was wrong) if monkeys grew into humans, then why aren't the monkeys we have in our era turning into humans? How can a single cell organism, which has proven to not be able to grow into any animal, grow into one, as evolutionists believe? My original post seemed very ironic, thus, I am editing it to this, hate all you want, evolution, no matter the religious belief, is not true.

Anyone else laugh when they saw OP's name after reading the topic?

Oh flying Spaghettimonster come to this Thread And punish all heretics Who don't see your shiny aspect Punish the stupid people who believe in the wrong theory Oh flying Spaghettimonster we can't life in peace with heretics you should destroy them They believe in a false god and don't worship you Oh flying Spaghettimonster give me the power to spread your wisedom Give me the power to nuke all the people that have a different opinion then I have Let me be your tool Let me be your rage Let me be your voice

[url=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OvmvxAcT_Yc]Relevant[/url]

From here on out in ignoring all replies I get on this thread. Despite my evidence and arguments, you completely deny it saying "well I don't think that's true soooo". This thread is the equivalent of a wall talking simulator.

Where is the option for both a belief in evolution and creationist? That's where I am at in my beliefs.

It's called the theory of evolution not the fact of evolution. That's like saying "who believes 1+1=3". It's silly. I believe evolution is the best explanation for how life exists on earth. But it has yet to become fact.

Our brain have a limit, there are things our brain simply cannot comprehend or understand. God made that limit.

Wow... You honestly don't know what you are talking about... You try and sell yourself as intelligent but fall pretty -blam!-ing short. As mentioned in other responses there are other forms of dating other than carbon. Also your lack of understanding when it comes to macro evolution... Common ancestor... We did not come from apes. We have a common ancestor. That means apes and humans came from something else before us hence the similarities not only physically but down to our very DNA. I will not waste my time picking apart the rest of your retarded wall of text as it quite simple that you lack the education to even progress further with this discussion.

It is PATHETIC that people believe in creationism. OP talks about a lack of evidence in evolution, and then gives a shoutout to CREATIONISTS for "putting up" with evolutionists. The only defense any christian ever has is the bible, and I'm pretty sure you can't create facts from a fairy tale.

"Creationists putting up with evolutionists lack of evidence" Di-..did I read that correct? I can't take you people seriously. Edit - Click the arrow for a religion war.

For anything to even be considered a scientific theory doesn't it have to be repeatable? How the hell do you repeat evolution and who declared it a fact? [spoiler]not trying to spark religious debate, I'm just curious[/spoiler]

This has nothing to do with evolution, but here we go. Assume you're right. God doesn't exist, and evolution is true. Then human life is pointless and meaningless. We are no better than apes. Nothing you do can matter, because the universe runs on chance. You will have fun for your life, because you know there's nothing after it. I will spend my life in a false sense of security that nonetheless gives me joy. And in the end, I've wasted maybe 80 years following a fake image, and you've spent 80 years living your life to the fullest. We both cease to exist after death and no longer mean anything. Now let's assume I'm right. God does exist, and he created everything and loves us. Then human life has purpose. We have a higher being to confide in and love. Those that believe are fufilled. And in the end, you've enjoyed 80 years, only to spend the rest of time in torment. I've lived my life in the way it was supposed to, and although it may seem like wasted time, I will spend until the end of time in paradise. Now look at the true repercussions. If you're right, neither of us mean anything in the end. If I'm right, you spend all of eternity being punished, and I'll spend it bring rewarded. Is that a risk you're willing to take? [spoiler]I get that this isn't going to convert anyone, or even make them doubt their atheism. This was more of a, "Christians, don't let them get you down." post. But if by any chance this made you think, pm me and we can talk. I'm very open. :)[/spoiler]