{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
작성자: TrixRidiculous
8/28/2015 6:51:07 PM
408
Should the triumphs have included the lighthouse?
Not meant to be an elitist thread. Just wondering people's opinions. I think seeing the lighthouse was a legitimate endgame activity. More then getting golden chests... just a thought
Edit: bunch of interesting opinions. Some people seem like elitists, others seem like they just never want to play pvp which is a fine argument. It's not changing now so it doesn't actually matter. Personally I just see it as a critical part of completing everything year 1 had to offer, that's all.
English
#Destiny
-
1 답변I wouldn't say lighthouse, but getting rank 5 in one iron banner wouldn't be asking too much.
-
1 답변Triumphs shouldn't be rng based. There is no skill based matchmaking, so for some unlucky people, they will never be able to get to the lighthouse.
-
With all the cheating really concentrated there it wouldn't be fair, I think. I am getting better at PvP, my stats are dragged down by early Thorn bounty, but I only played 2 trials matches and went 0-5 both times. Both times I couldn't damage anyone and their connection was going red/green/red....
-
작성자: VoxNovo 8/31/2015 3:47:10 PMI've been to the lighthouse, but I don't think it should be. Nor do I feel you should need flawless raider, which would be the PvE equivalent of the Lighthouse. If anything, it should maybe include something like: "win XX games in Trials".
-
11 답변작성자: Vinc3Charming 8/31/2015 1:57:44 PMPlaying trials at all is community locked https://www.bungie.net/en-GB/Forum/Post/150507559/0/0 So no
-
4 답변
-
작성자: I Pye 8/31/2015 1:27:12 PMI don't think it should as most of the game is catered towards pveers. That's where most of people's time is spent. People who don't enjoy pvp shouldn't be forced to get good at something they don't enjoy. Let's face it most of us brought this game for the pve not the pvp
-
I think so, it's a moment of triumphs and that seems like a pretty good triumph to me. The emblem isn't just a year one emblem that should be easy to get, it should be completing the hardest things in destiny. That includes flawless..
-
No and not just because i haven't gotten it. Skolas is a set difficulty and not really hard. Trials difficulty is dependant on the random enemies that are chosen for you and most times if they start losing they start lagging suddenly and can't be killed. If trials was fixed and they actually matched you with people of a similar skill I'd agree.
-
1 답변
-
They should have at least put that you needed to win it maybe just play a few rounds in trials. Since they put skolas in their they should have added something for trials since they did put crucible in there. I never went flawless because reasons and just know don't really care if I do or don't. I would like to but I won't die if I don't.
-
The only reason I say yes is not to feel more "special" as some say but because it includes the most difficult pve content, so why not pvp? To make it more reasonable for those not good at pvp it should have at least required 9 wins on a passage. That way you don't have to go flawless but at least get to 9 wins without 3 losses.
