I was just reading replies because someone dragged this up from the deeps. I gotta say I love this reply. Here you equate animals eating their own young as natural, and at the same time compare homosexual acts as natural because animals do it. So if someone ate their own child could they say it's natural because animals do? OR maybe the things animals do aren't a justification for what would be natural behavior in humans. Thereby invalidating the argument that homosexuality is natural because it happens "in nature".