{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
작성자: MR Desired
7/31/2015 11:22:11 AM
297
Am i the onlyone that agrees with basically every nerf coming in September
Gjallarhorn agree
Thorn agree
Last word agree
I agree with everything that is taking place besides the ice breaker nerf
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlOpcVBIDU
English
#Destiny
-
2 답변
-
99% agree, I thought the icebreaker one may have been a hair harsh but I can definitely see where they're coming from. I don't think anything after this patch is going to be unusable, everything should just fit into its intended role better.
-
i agree with alot of it because bungie will provide new beautiful things, new guns to replace our classics. i dont agree with the black hammer as it makes it a standard rifle. the gjallerhorn wont be that bad and i hear there is something to replace it. the ice breaker we will have to choose our shots and shotguns need a range check. no one should be shot across a map with one of those. good to see auto rifles come up, i would have buffed fusion too. we will just have to see.
-
I don't get the IB nerf either, I don't know about you guys but never do I find anyone in the Strike playlist camping with IB. Nightfall and Weekly Heroic Strikes are different, you have to play more strategic with elemental burns, so are they taking that into consideration? I don't know. I also don't agree with the Gally nerf, Xur hasn't sold in since that first time long ago, if elitism is a problem, then why not have Xur sell it? I know that it has been pretty Op, but it's not our fault boss fights are pop weapons and shoot that -blam!-er! Also, I would say it's probably the best Exotic in the game, that said, it's going to be OP. RPG games end game items usually are going to stomp faces.
-
3 답변Update 2.0 - brought to touch by the T.o.O. Bungie has just highlighted that the future primary focus of Destiny is PVP. All of changes were driven from the PVP stand point. Their "reasoning" was basically insulting too. Gjally because the lack of a specific weapon was never meant to exclude users from content? Have Xur sell it then. Shotguns because we'd lost the thrill of a close encounter with enemies? Because 35 P.o.E. Fallen Captains with Light switch were just too easy. Icebreaker because your could camp at the back and eat sandwiches? So nerf it in a way that let's your eat even more whilst you're camp. Hand cannons - T.o.O. driven Last round - T.o.O. driven Shotgun Range - T.o.O. driven Icebreaker - PvP restricted special driven. Black hammer - required because Icebreaker was PvP'd and we couldn't have a legendary even more superior to an exotic. Pre trials all of the "problems" weren't such big issues, but when you're force PvE players to play PvP for elemental primaries then you invite the cries of "Nerf Everything".
-
4 답변You guys need to understand that in the taken king there will most likely be exotics 10 times better than the ones we have now and we will probably forget about every year 1 gun
-
2 답변How can anyone support what is clearly nothing more than a way to slow down players and pad game time. PVP nerfs are fine because the meta is very broken right now, but the PVE nerfs are stupid. Does anyone really want to spend even more time on an activity for what are generally garbage rewards?
-
1 답변Don't agree with nerfing any of the weapons games get ruined because game developers listen to whining bi**hes, why not just give us all pea shooters and be done with it
-
2 답변
-
6 답변
