{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
작성자: dazarobbo
7/16/2015 4:34:21 AM
212
Jake was drunk. Josie was drunk. Jake and Josie hooked up. Jake -blam!- Josie.
-
5 답변I once got into an argument with a feminist on this topic on this site. I was later banned. GG moderators
-
7 답변
-
53 답변I am wondering if technology is capable of sorting or helping with this mess of consent, information, and "morning after, what the hell happened?" A phone app that asks each person a single screen of questions. With each field being shared, hidden, unanswered (by choosing a S/H/U flag to the left of the question) Questions like. First Name Last Name Telephone #/sms/email DOB Age Do you have any STDs? Do you plan on using a barrier? Are you under the influence of alcohol? Are you under the influence of drugs? Are you planning on having sex? And when finished, the phone uses the camera to snap an image. They then hand it to their potential partner, who answers the same questions for themselves, gets a pic of their face snapped. And then the event is geo-tagged and presents them with their potential partners answers with a "Do you agree to have sex with this person?" and the phone going back between parties 1 and 2. That way, the morning after, if someone's memory isn't clear, they have a log of what they said (facts or lies) what the other person said (facts or lies) and if either party disputes the events or statements, there is the mutual agreement along with each of their selfies. It would take as long to complete the process as it would to wait for the bartender to bring you your next round, and it would indicate a level of consent and show a level of truthfulness in the areas that responsible people who are about to have sex should discuss or at least acknowledge. Yeah, it takes away a level of mystery and romance, but it also means that you've potentially (provided that no one's lied or hidden their information) the ability to follow-up with the person, avoid an accusation that you took advantage of, or documents of who you were with and where if a crime does occur.
-
1 답변Wow. Yeah, logically, that could go either way. She could just as easily be at fault, though good luck getting that one to stick. I will never be able to wrap my mind around that. I have, in the past, gotten drunk with a man whom I ended up sleeping with. While I may not have been proud of it later, and may even have regretted it, I've never called -blam!- over it. While I may not have legally been able to give consent, in the moment I still wanted it. Regardless of whether I regretted it once sobering up or not. Smh.
-
1 답변Jake was drunk, Josie was drunk, Josie gave Jake a BJ, Josie sexually assaulted Jake.
-
2 답변작성자: HeadHunter 7/13/2015 3:33:42 PM
-
3 답변
-
1 답변I love how no females have commented on this but oh no if there was some "misogynist" post they would be all over it.
-
We know someone who was accused of -blam!- a few years ago. No -blam!- happened, they met on a night out, she was a friend of a friend that was coming out with us that night. She had a few to drink, went home with one of the lads and they had sex. Next day her husband asked her where she went that night so she lied to him and told him her drink was spiked and she woke up in a lads house naked. The problem there was 9 of them slept in that house on that night, 4 of which were her friends, not ours. No one backed up her story and the tox test came back clear. She was charged with wasting police time, got quite a hefty fine and her husband divorced her without having to split his money because she was caught cheating so cleared up in court. She cried -blam!- and lost everything but had she managed to pull it off, my friend would have lost everything so she got what she deserved. He now has CCTV in his living room and gets consent on camera before moving to the bedroom ... where he doesn't film, hopefully.
-
5 답변
-
3 답변That [u]really[/u] happens, and sometimes they even get found guilty in court. In my younger days I loved me some hot drunk girl attention as much as the next guy, but I would never bed them for this very reason. I would get a number and call/text the next day and bang them later, which usually worked.
-
2 답변
-
And here we find a rare picture of daz and his former girlfriend. [spoiler]jk man. Yeah, the wording is pretty silly to say the least, and my personal opinion is that if they are BOTH drunk, then do either of them really have the ability to control their actions and/or give consent to the other? I could be completely wrong here, but the man must give consent as well.[/spoiler]
-
2 답변
-
5 답변
-
2 답변
-
4 답변작성자: Its Washable 7/14/2015 3:13:46 AMTook this from redstate.com [quote]Predator? Jake. Prey? Josie. Why? Male v. female. That's why. And the "Be responsible" message seems aimed at Jake more than anything. The reality that is completely avoided by this poster is that neither man nor woman, when sufficiently intoxicated, has or exercises self-restraint. That is just the truth of that type of situation. But although this is the case, Jake was the sole perpetrator, and Josie would never be considered an accomplice. With advertisements such as this, the Left is saying that women [b]need[/b] to be protected. They are admitting that women [b]need[/b] help over men. And here I thought women in 2015 America were strong creatures who kick down the patriarchy with every independent thought of theirs? Oh, how I was wrong. We're helpless creatures, right? Well, apparently only in situations where accusation of assault might come up. Only then are we allowed to pearl-clutch in the corner, albeit briefly[/quote]
