Memorial Day in America is coming up this Monday. We're to remember all those who died in prior wars protecting America from attack and protecting freedom!
Welcome to the land of the free and the home of the brave. Let's all remember... but wait, this is all bullshit.
The United States isn't in threat of being invaded. In fact, the last time the country was invaded by a state was 1814 when the White House was burned to the ground by the British.
Here is a list of the countries the United States has had military involvement in:
[quote]The following is a list of countries invaded by the US forces (naval, military and ultimately air forces) since its inception in order of major incidents. This catalogue derives heavily form the work of US academic Dr Zoltan Grossman's article “From Wounded Knee to Libya : a century of U.S. military interventions” [1], Gideon Polya's book ‘Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950” (that includes a brief history of all countries since Neolithic times) [2] and William Blum's book “ Rogue State ” [3]. This list includes instances of violent deployment of US forces within America (e.g. against demonstrators, miners etc), and includes small-scale bombing and military intervention operations, military evacuations of Americans and specific instances of explicit threats of use of nuclear weapons. The list does not include the 1801-1805 US Marine Barbary War operations against Barbary pirates based in Morocco , Algeria , Tunisia and Libya , and also ignores massive US subversion of virtually all countries in the world.
(1) American Indian nations (1776 onwards, American Indian Genocide; 1803, Louisiana Purchase; 1844, Indians banned from east of the Mississippi; 1861 onwards, California genocide; 1890, Lakota Indians massacre), (2) Mexico (1836-1846; 1913; 1914-1918; 1923), (3) Nicaragua (1856-1857; 1894; 1896; 1898; 1899; 1907; 1910; 1912-1933; 1981-1990), (4) American forces deployed against Americans (1861-1865, Civil War; 1892; 1894; 1898; 1899-1901; 1901; 1914; 1915; 1920-1921; 1932; 1943; 1967; 1968; 1970; 1973; 1992; 2001), (5), Argentina (1890), (6), Chile (1891; 1973), (7) Haiti (1891; 1914-1934; 1994; 2004-2005), (8) Hawaii (1893-), (9) China (1895-1895; 1898-1900; 1911-1941; 1922-1927; 1927-1934; 1948-1949; 1951-1953; 1958), (10) Korea (1894-1896; 1904-1905; 1951-1953), (11) Panama (1895; 1901-1914; 1908; 1912; 1918-1920; 1925; 1958; 1964; 1989-), (12) Philippines (1898-1910; 1948-1954; 1989; 2002-), (13) Cuba (1898-1902; 1906-1909; 1912; 1917-1933; 1961; 1962), (14) Puerto Rico (1898-; 1950; ); (15) Guam (1898-), (16) Samoa (1899-), (17) Honduras (1903; 1907; 1911; 1912; 1919; 1924-1925; 1983-1989), (18) Dominican Republic (1903-1904; 1914; 1916-1924; 1965-1966), (19) Germany (1917-1918; 1941-1945; 1948; 1961), (20) Russia (1918-1922), (21) Yugoslavia (1919; 1946; 1992-1994; 1999), (22) Guatemala (1920; 1954; 1966-1967), (23) Turkey (1922), (24) El Salvador (1932; 1981-1992), (25) Italy (1941-1945); (26) Morocco (1941-1945), (27) France (1941-1945), (28) Algeria (1941-1945), (29) Tunisia (1941-1945), (30) Libya (1941-1945; 1981; 1986; 1989; 2011), (31) Egypt (1941-1945; 1956; 1967; 1973; 2013), (32) India (1941-1945), (33) Burma (1941-1945), (34) Micronesia (1941-1945), (35) Papua New Guinea (1941-1945), (36) Vanuatu (1941-1945), (37) Austria (1941-1945), (38) Hungary (1941-1945), (39) Japan (1941-1945), (40) Iran (1946; 1953; 1980; 1984; 1987-1988; ), (41) Uruguay (1947), (42) Greece (1947-1949), (43) Vietnam (1954; 1960-1975), (44) Lebanon (1958; 1982-1984), (45) Iraq (1958; 1963; 1990-1991; 1990-2003; 1998; 2003-2011), (46) Laos (1962-), (47) Indonesia (1965), (48) Cambodia (1969-1975; 1975), (49) Oman (1970), (50) Laos (1971-1973), (51) Angola (1976-1992), (52) Grenada (1983-1984), (53) Bolivia (1986; ), (54) Virgin Islands (1989), (55) Liberia (1990; 1997; 2003), (56) Saudi Arabia (1990-1991), (57) Kuwait (1991), (58) Somalia (1992-1994; 2006), (59) Bosnia (1993-), (60) Zaire (Congo) (1996-1997), (61) Albania (1997), (62) Sudan (1998), (63) Afghanistan (1998; 2001-), (64) Yemen (2000; 2002-), (65) Macedonia (2001), (66) Colombia (2002-), (67) Pakistan (2005-), (68) Syria (2008; 2011-), (69) Uganda (2011), (70) Mali (2013), (71) Niger (2013).[/quote]
http://www.countercurrents.org/polya050713.htm
The troops are protecting my freedom? Sure they are. Keep telling yourself that the troops are the only thing keeping other governments from attacking the United States.
The troops are an invading force. They are not a force for defense. Prove me wrong if you can.
[spoiler]You can't.[/spoiler]
-
8 답변
-
4 답변So if our military is only for "Invasion" would you care to explain to me why there are bases in the Union, why there are contingency plans for any invasion by foreign entities(not terrorists but actual ground forces)? Would you also care to explain to me why every other nation that has the ability to invade the Union has not? No wait, don't because I don't care if you support the troops or not. To lessen your fellow Human Beings simply because they stepped up and joined makes you no better than them by your logic. Perhaps you should speak to your elected official about what you want the military to do instead of making an edgy Wiki copy paste post, whilst committing red herring fallacies by not providing actual fact and simply pasting ad hominem links. Politicians are in charge of tasking, the military is not self directing. Shift your blame to the user of the tool, not the tool itself.
-
5 답변
-
4 답변
-
1 답변What I think you aren't comprehending is that those soldiers are also defending your right to leave the USA and never come back.
-
1 답변Idk about you but I wouldn't go and pick a fight with the guy that punched that other kid's face in when they were flailing their fists arround. That's how the US military protects you.
-
15 답변
-
21 답변I don't think I understand your point entirely. Are you saying that the U.S military is not a force for defense? And only to invade others? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
-
11 답변Cites military action in Germany and against Japan from 1941-1945...doesn't realize said military action was the factor that won WWII
-
2 답변
-
2 답변
-
1 답변https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/black-or-white Just because it's not an invasion doesn't mean it's not a threat.
-
1 답변
-
9 답변Actually the last time we were invaded was 1863 by the confederate states of America.
-
2 답변
-
2 답변
-
9 답변I support the troops because they have the balls to volunteer. I don't support the government and the corrupt reasons that they send our troops were they send them.
-
3 답변작성자: iEddy13 5/23/2015 9:24:34 PMI find it sad that some of the people I grew up with are joining the army to 'support/protect their country' and whatnot. People have been brainwashed into thinking that it's some glorious think when in reality many soldiers end up with PTSD and are 'abandoned' by the same government that used them. I'm no expert on military forces but OP is kinda right. The idealism of those that join is noble and I commend their bravery but they're just being used by their goverments for political and economical gain :/ Edit: TLDR, I support soldiers (and their idealism) as people, but I don't support their employers and their shady motives
-
36 답변Our military is completely composed of volunteers, they're deployed by a government that is entirely made up of elected officials that we put in office. If you don't support them then big deal, but actively opposing them is just autistic
-
1 답변작성자: Xboxdotcom 5/23/2015 11:00:01 PM
-
작성자: Bofeious 5/23/2015 11:06:28 PMLong time ago! but it's mostly for 2nd world war dudes they gave their all & then a little bit more! (Salute to fallen gods) Granted since then "WAR" has been more about political or money/oil gain! :( so yes disagree with the modern motivation of it but not the reasons it was created for! 15-20year olds giving their lives because they were told they must to defend the ones they loved! you look up nobility in any English dictionary & those guys had it in spades! In fact spades is insufficient shovels is more appropriate! 1st war worse but none left to honour now! :(