-
It's not so much that Mario needs to die, it just doesn't need more games (they aren't getting any better for the most part). The thing is, it will be a sad time when they stop making Mario games, just because of how prominent the franchise has been.
-
14 답변
-
2 답변You make me cry with mario :( jk I get where your coming from, if you don't like platformers chances are you are not going to like Mario
-
2 답변Halo, Pokemon, and Sonic need to die. Assassin's Creed and Call of Duty need to be slowed down to 1 every 2 years at the least. Although technically that is COD's release schedule, but it has 2 developers.
-
Sonic maybe, Mario never that's where it started for me I even started my daughter on Mario. by ac if you mean assassins creed I'm going to say yes up to revelations i think there milking it now. Cod definitely if they can't bring back what used to be a decent online game
-
8 답변작성자: TheDesertRanger 4/24/2015 10:55:57 AM
-
2 답변Cod by far, it's sorta like crack. You play modern warfare 2 for the first time and your blown away. You try and chase that same rush with each release and are let down each time, worse than before. But that -blam!-er will keep selling, and ign will continue to give it more than questionable review scores. [spoiler]Any one else smell the money??[/spoiler]
-
13 답변Battlefield, Halo, non-Treyarch CoD (need my zombies), Mario, Legend of Zelda (next one might change my mind), AC, Dark Souls.
-
1 답변작성자: DJ 4/25/2015 7:01:25 PM
-
4 답변
-
Mario and Sonic do not need to die. the entire way that their franchise are set up are for endless opportunities in so many different kinds of games. cod need to go back to its roots and if it died i would be fine with it but not mario and sonic.
-
1 답변
-
4 답변
-
2 답변
-
2 답변
-
2 답변Animal crossing series.... They have 4, 2 was enough.. :/ [spoiler]jk though if you don't like acnl you probably were dropped on your head as a baby[/spoiler]