{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
작성자: CrimsonIXEspada
4/10/2015 3:49:46 AM
219
Who do you think is more likely to start WWIII?
Pretty straight forward question. It's not to get everyone all gun happy.
Realistically, within the next [i]20 years,[/i] who do you think will [i]"fire the first shot"[/i] and ignite the Third World War? Why?
[b][i][u]Edit: [/u][/i][/b]For my fellow Americans, what do you guys think of all these theories that suggest a Martial Law being instated in the near future?
And for our foreign brethren, what do you guys think?
Note: Let's not bash any countries or ethnicities.
English
#Offtopic
-
2 답변
-
3 답변Those people in that other thread who put milk in first [i]then[/i] cereal. Who does that!?
-
4 답변I believe that when it's all looked back on, it will be determined that the battle lines were being drawn now. In the instances of major global conflict, there was a lot of "domino stacking" done beforehand, alliances and partnerships made, all that made it possible for things to go to hell once the proper spark hit the right part of the fuse. I look at current events, and I see dominoes being placed carefully.... it's a tricky and dangerous game, but there's always hope that someone can spot the pattern, raise awareness, and convince the players that stepping back is better than marching forward.
-
1 답변
-
5 답변the way I see it, it could go one of three ways: 1. ISIS gain control over the Middle East and attempt another attack on the US. US and Middle East go to war, EU gets roped into it. 2. North Korea has been working on a secret Nuke Program and deploys it against western Europe and the US. a nuclear-crippled US is then invaded (like in the FPS game Homefront) 3. the US steps against Vladimir Putin and his attempts to create a new Soviet Union. Putin declares war against US, everyone else gets roped in. personally I think the Middle East will NEVER be peaceful, too many extremist groups and different religions. it will always be a hotbed for conflict, and nothing short of total nuclear Devastation could stop it (not that it would help anyway). Kim Jong Un has done some acting up, but it's probably because of his late Father, as long as they stay quiet, they aren't so much a threat as they are a mystery. Putin is definitely pushing for more territory, and if the Balkan States can't defend themselves, the US will get called in (or volunteer to help). if the politicians can't negotiate, then things will get ugly, and the bitter rivalry between America and Russia will rear it's ugly head once again. that's my two cents. buy a gun guys, you could be fighting in the streets before you know it.
-
World War III will not happen. Russia, China, The United States, The United Kingdom, and France would never declare war on another one, because they have all of the nukes, pretty much. However, we cold very well see a proxy war in the Middle East or perhaps Eastern Europe if Russia's trying to pull the same thing they did after World War II.
-
8 답변
-
1 답변
-
2 답변
-
>Norks winning If Norkland does anything against the U.S, even China would bust in to stop them. They certainly don't want war with the U.S The U.S/South Korea having land right next to China has silver lining. A nuclear war with the U.S doesn't
-
1 답변
-
14 답변The US will keep poking other countries with a stick until they finally punch the US in the face. Then the US can justify beating the shit out of them.
