Okay, I'm not sure what all of this entails but I have read, heard, and speculated enough on this to want to voice my opinion here on these forums. Which in turn may pose to be a bad idea seeing as how many folks are flaming some forum posts because their opinion is "the-end-all-be-all" of all opinions – no one else's can even be considered. Well take it how you want but remember this: opinions are like buttholes – everyone has them and the all stink. So to some (or many) this may smell a little, but consider it with some thought before dismissing.
A short history about me. I've been a MMO player for years now. Started in late 2006 with Wow and have since spread from there. I've also been a heavy Halo player as well since before 2006. And I've been a gamer since the original Nintendo duck hunt, and floppy disk games. I digress though.
It seems this talk about a "Destiny 2" is very interesting to me. Destiny in my opinion is already an MMO. It has no reason to have a "second" game. None. Zilch. Nada. If you can do DLC and expansions that build upon the base game, then why make a second one? You would only be fracturing your player base! And as u can see it right now, it's far to fragile to fracture. I understand fully that the sole existence is to make money. I'm not stupid and wasn't born yesterday. Money tends to make the world go round for some, if not most. However, think of the path you could forge by doing this. A MMO shooter with an awesome expanding story (because space is pretty vast), and great PVP on a level unheard of. Do not be afraid of doing this – EMBRACE IT. Make it worth it for ten years for us to build our legend! To become legend in a game that is ambitious, ground-breaking, and awesome! Don't fracture this great community you say we have by making multiple games. I for one really enjoy this game and plan on playing it for a while, but if I have to have several copies of the game I am sure to reconsider. This is not a shooter franchise that needs multiple games. Build your legend to become legend Bungie.
Just my two cents. Or smelly butthole. Cover your nose if you don't like it.
English
#feedback
-
Bump, please make this into an MMO, 'shared-world-shooter' my ass, it's an fps version of an mmo, Bungie should treat it like one... Why would anyone ever want to work all so hard and grind if it is all for naught when the new game comes out and you have to do all this shit again even though the storyline and content from 'Destiny 2' could be implemented into the current Destiny gameworld; that's how MMOs work... Ps Bungie please stop defining an MMO(RPG)FPS as a shared world shooter -.-
-
3 通の返信I have to say, as this is heralded by bungie as an MMO, creating a second game indeed nullifies that concept and then falls under the same catagory as say COD. A true MMO is built upon it's base, expanded on to continue the story or create new ones within or alongside it's original premise in which those areas already visited are always there and can be repeated. MMO's are a giant world that continues to expand without removing the begonning. Creating a seperate game isolates the first. Will you be able to go to all those places you are able to now? The simple answer is no as it would be twice the content on one disc which would never happen as we have seen from this edition and it's locked content to squeeze more money. The idea of 'becoming legend' then is just a gimmick as building a character, maxing his potential then suddenly poof he is gone and it's another do over with the repetiveness already become tiresome and requiring DLC by the first 4 weeks of release is laughable. This is COD....just looks different and has supers and alienesk weapons. It's a FPS with a small taste of an MMO till a new version comes out...add a gathering place to COD and presto...besides...a MMO isn't limited to 12 people in the same area. Unless of course you feel 12 players are a massive amount.
-
I don't care one way or the other. Bungie blew their load in the advertising then, when the game launched? They laid there like a dead fish. I will not be buying D2. I don't trust them. They can't get this game straightened out.
-
2 通の返信As long as character transfer is part of destiny two i think it will more or less work the same
-
1 返信As you said my opinion but I believe a lot of the limitations was due to the wide platform launch to maximize sales between PS3/4 Xbox 360/1. I honestly believe destiny two will be "next gen" exclusive, include some of the ideas in the forums, and be more expansive. I think Bungie painted themselves into a bad spot with the four systems and adding anything outside the already planned dlc is pretty much out of the question. Your comment/comparison to wow (and this is a somewhat techie background feel to correct) assumes that all are running the minimum requirements like on a pc so pushing new content is much easier to the wow servers then Bungie. Not impossible but difficult and expensive.... In my opinion why the sequel.
-
Bro the difference is $60 plus DLC vs just DLC costs. They alienated their player base and to me at least that original how many million copies sold will be alot different come the fulfillment of the final D1 DLC. I wont be moving onto the next one at this point. The "hole in the roof, let me paint the walls" bit is a bit old for me at this point.
-
2 通の返信One reason the game will exist with sequels within a few years after its first release. Because the game is jut like any other non MMO in the market. Why make new iterations of assassins creed when the game can just be updated over the internet? This game is not an MMO. If you had been playing MMOs since '06 you would know this
-
I agree. Why make another game when the players have this one and have paid for DLC in between. I don't think all players will move across to Destiny 2 and what happens to 1 when it's released? Just slowly dies as no one plays it anymore? that's sad
-
3 通の返信Irrelevant idea is irrelevant. The 10 year plan revolves around 4 games with dlc in between each. This is the plan and the agreement Bungie and Activision have contracted for.