[url=http://bigstory.ap.org/article/us-soldier-released-after-5-years-captivity]Seriously?[/url]
[quote]WASHINGTON (AP) — Five years a captive from the Afghanistan war, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl is back in American hands, freed for five Guantanamo terrorism detainees in a swap stirring sharp debate in Washington over whether the U.S. should have negotiated with the Taliban over prisoners.
U.S. officials said Sunday that Bergdahl's health and safety appeared in jeopardy, prompting rapid action to secure his release. Republicans said the deal could place U.S. troops in danger, especially if the freed detainees return to the fight — one called it "shocking." Arizona Sen. John McCain said of the five detainees, "These are the hardest of the hard core."
Visiting troops in Afghanistan, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel stepped forward at Bagram Air Field to thank the special operations forces who retrieved Bergdahl, who officials said was the only American prisoner of war still held by insurgents in that conflict. Gen. Joseph Dunford spoke of the excitement that spread through U.S. ranks when the sergeant's release was confirmed. "You almost got choked up," he said. "It was pretty extraordinary."
Tireless campaigners for their son's freedom, Bob and Jani Bergdahl thanked all who were behind the effort to retrieve him. "You were not left behind," Bob Bergdahl told reporters, as if speaking to his son. "We are so proud of the way this was carried out." He spoke in Boise, Idaho, as residents in the sergeant's hometown of Hailey prepared for a homecoming celebration.
Hagel was met with silence when he told troops in a Bagram hangar: "This is a happy day. We got one of our own back." It was unclear whether the absence of cheers and applause came from a reluctance to display emotion in front of the Pentagon chief or from any doubts among the troops about Bergdahl.
In weighing the swap, U.S. officials decided it could help the effort to reach reconciliation with the Taliban, which the U.S. sees as key to more security in Afghanistan. But they acknowledged the risk that the deal would embolden insurgents, perhaps encouraging them to grab U.S. troops or citizens as bargaining chips for the release of others in U.S. custody.
Republicans pressed that point. "Have we just put a price on other U.S. soldiers?" asked Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas. "What does this tell terrorists, that if you capture a U.S. soldier, you can trade that soldier for five terrorists?"
"I'm going to celebrate him coming home," said Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois. But the release of "five mid- to high-level Taliban is shocking to me, especially without coming to Congress."
Republicans also said the deal violated requirements that Congress be given 30 days' notice before any exchange of captives at Guantanamo.
National security adviser Susan Rice said "an urgent and an acute situation," which she did not specify, did not allow that time.
"We did not have 30 days to wait," she said. "And had we waited and lost him, I don't think anybody would have forgiven the United States government."[/quote]
English
#Offtopic
-
5 通の返信Plus, he went AWOL/deserted his post, 6 soldiers died looking for him, and he befriended his "captors"
-
1 返信
-
5 通の返信
-
4 通の返信I'm glad we're getting rid of those Gitmo prisoners. There is literally no point to be keeping them there.
-
2 通の返信A more esoteric question here, but who are we supposed to negotiate with in this situation? When we say we don't negotiate with terrorists, that's well and good for Al Qaeda and the like. But the Taliban was the official government until we ousted them. Are their only options surrender or death? Is that the game we are playing over there? If this happened in WWII, we would be telling the Germans that there is no negotiations at all for POW's and that they may as well kill them. I'm just finding it confusing when the Taliban became a terrorist organization. I though that they were a government that allowed terrorists to use their land, and not the terrorists themselves.
-
[quote]In an appearance on ABC's This Week on Sunday, National Security Adviser Susan Rice claimed that Bergdahl "wasn't simply a hostage, he was an American prisoner of war, taken on the battlefield." She added: "He served the United States with honor and distinction." "That's not true," says Specialist Cody Full, who served in the same platoon as Bergdahl, and whose tweets over the weekend as @CodyFNfootball offered an early firsthand account of Bergdahl's departure. "He was not a hero. What he did was not honorable. He knowingly deserted and put thousands of people in danger because he did. We swore to an oath and we upheld ours. He did not." "He walked off—and 'walked off' is a nice way to put it," says Specialist Josh Cornelison, the medic in Bergdahl's platoon. "He was accounted for late that afternoon. He very specifically planned to walk out in the middle of the night." "He was a deserter," says Specialist Full. "There's no question in the minds of anyone in our platoon." "You don't mail all your personal belongings home, especially your computer. It's not like you can go to a sports bar -- there's no sports bars over there," says Specialist Full. "You just wouldn't give up your computer if you weren't planning to leave. He knowingly deserted and he put countless fellow Americans in danger -- not just his platoon mates."[/quote] Wow. - Der
-
11 通の返信I'm essentially going to decompress everything I said in my thread. It should be noted that he has and is being accused by both former and active duty personnel (including of his own unit) of both desertion and going AWOL. It should also be noted that all five Taliban detainees have extensive ties to AQ and we're considered "high risk". Two are also wanted by the UN for their roles in the massacre of 300+ Shia Muslims. Congress was also not notified, as required by law, of this transfer. I am happy our POW is back, but this whole ordeal smells.
-
1 返信I have to agree that this trade was a pretty dumb idea. Conservatives still annoy the shit out of me though.
-
10 通の返信
-
8 通の返信Forever Bergにより編集済み: 6/2/2014 8:52:40 PM-soldier deserted his station and gets abducted -other soldiers died searching for him -captured soldier partied on Christmas with terrorists, played games like badminton -trade 5 "high level threat" terrorists for this one deserting POW Wow, great move Obama administration. Now the terrorist organizations are planning on kidnapping more soldiers and citizens to bargain with since they see they can be successful.
-
15 通の返信It was a shitty thing of us to do. That POW is probably brainwashed, and while he may be an American citizen, an E4 is not worth 5 high ranking terrorist leaders. Then there's the fact that he was a deserter to begin with.
-
6 通の返信5 Terrorists were released in exchanged for a deserter who left his post and walked into the enemy's hands. Not to mention that Obama once again broke the law by not informing Congress 30 days prior to the tradeoff.
-
13 通の返信
-
7 通の返信So when is Obama gonna get us back Sgt. Tahmooressi from Mexico? He won't even have to release any high profile prisoners in that deal.
-
1 返信