And if not, why not? By "all forms", I'm including heterosexual, homosexual, polygamist, incestuous, and any other kind of marriage between consenting adults.
-
3 通の返信Marriage is a sacred bond between a man and a woman. Homosexuals and such should have to register as sex offenders.
-
4 通の返信I'm generally not too fond of the whole topic of marriage but I am exceptionally against incest, beasteality, and homosexuality simply because it's biologically and biblically incorrect. So even if you're religious or atheistic it's still incorrect.
-
3 通の返信
-
9 通の返信
-
4 通の返信
-
Psyにより編集済み: 4/23/2014 12:51:54 AMNo, not all of them. Most, but not all. Hetero, Homo, Poly etc is all fine. Incestual - It's not fair on the child for them to be born out of incest, mostly because their life will be hell courtesy of society and the assholes in it. What I really should say/do is post that I don't care who faks who, provided they are responsible about it. Creating children who are going to live a miserable life is irresponsible and that's not just exclusive to incestuous relationships either.
-
1 返信Incest is iffy, but it's not like it's never happened before. Just look at the Royal Family.
-
16 通の返信
-
Just figured I should say: the problems people have with incest are purely personal and not remotely based upon logic. Same way I feel about cannibalism: sure if its consensual it [i]should[/i] be legal, but I dont give a damn because I find it disgusting.
-
19 通の返信Polygamy and incest both limit the gene pool and hurt the overall health of humanity as a species.
-
6 通の返信I need to stop stamping on bear traps and bait. *sigh* Thanks for reigning me in a bit there mordo <.< I'm having a rather incoherent day.
-
3 通の返信Windomにより編集済み: 4/23/2014 1:24:50 AMI think everyone ITT should definitely take a look at [url=http://m.perthnow.com.au/news/kissing-cousins-ok/story-e6frg12c-1111116504749]this[/url] source. [quote]Prof Bittles reviewed 48 studies from 11 countries and found that the risks of birth defects rose from about 2 per cent in the general population to 4 per cent in consanguineous or same blood couples.[/quote]A change from 98% healthy children to 96% is definitely notable, but it's not nearly as dire as our society makes it out to be.
-
4 通の返信
-
6 通の返信
-
2 通の返信The Machineにより編集済み: 4/23/2014 2:06:46 AM[i][b]From an evolutionary standpoint, the only logical kind of union between two sexual beings is one between a make and female. However, human mating seems to be more about enjoyment than about reproduction. Therefore, if a human finds an unconventional union enjoyable, then that is the kind of union that he or she should pursue. [/b][/i]
-
6 通の返信HM Robにより編集済み: 4/23/2014 12:51:05 AMThe only type of marriage I support is heterosexual marriage. I'm not all that opposed to same-sex marriage in and of itself -- it's the slippery-slope created when we open up marriage to new definitions. I'm not saying that polygamy and incest [i]will[/i] be legalized after same-sex marriage, but I am saying that it's more likely. Furthermore, by defining marriage as it is now, you eliminate the chance of polygamist/incestuous marriages occurring.