This is the main issue. Story time. I got banned because i edited someones quote to say "in my ignorant opinion halowars is non-canon". I was told by Ka5 (the mod that hates me) my post was "non-constructive". Which upset me because the [b]rules[/b] say not to spread [b]misinformation[/b]. The Effin rule says that, the member broke the rule! yet i got banned. We all know my anger around the post with "Building a mcdonalds on requiem" not getting attention despite my telling to [b]mass report it[/b]. So i outright asked both Ka 5 and BS angel. [i]How is talking about building a mcdonalds on requiem considered constructive when it was completely off topic; yet me pointin out (in no negative or bannable matter) That someone's opinion doesn't reflect reality, a bannable and non-constructive offense[/i]? Ka 5 completely ignored that and i asked him [b] at least[/b] 4 times with each of my replies trying to focus on that aspect. He just said "Follow the rules". BS Angel [i]clearly[/i] knew they were in the wrong and i could tell. She ignored it as well though saying "it was his opinion of halowars[/i]". Funny. Can't people get banned for voice their [b]opinion[/b] that Brian Reed is a bad writer? That is an actual opinion which can form a constructive forum not talking about a freaking mcdonalds. Anytime someone tells you some nonsense like "Don't get banned" quote my experience. We tried asking them to give [b]examples[/b] for the rules and they can't even be [b]bothered[/b] to do that. Yet if you check their twitters they are constantly chatting about dumb stuff. Though i hate the forum it taught me [b]how[/b] to run one.