[quote]Doctors in South Dakota could face life in prison for performing virtually any abortion procedure under a new bill proposed by a Republican state lawmaker.
House Bill 1241 would make it a felony to perform any abortion procedure that causes a fetus to become "dismembered." Because fetuses are rarely removed completely intact during abortions, the bill could effectively ban the procedure entirely.
"This doesn't look like anything I've ever seen before," Elizabeth Nash, state issues manager for the Guttmacher Institute, told HuffPost. "It looks like it's trying to ban abortion using language that is completely unfamiliar and very inflammatory."
State Rep. Isaac Latterell (R), the bill’s sponsor, told the Argus Leader that the bill is intended to outlaw "gruesome" abortion procedures. “It just makes clear that a certain procedure that is totally horrific and gruesome to any reasonable person would not be an acceptable method of ending a child’s life, and that is to dismember or decapitate a living, unborn child,” he said.
The bill uses charged language that is likely intended to appeal to people's emotions and remind them of Kermit Gosnell, the Pennsylvania abortion provider who was charged with murder after performing gruesome and illegal late-term abortions. But South Dakota's only abortion clinic only performs abortions in the first 13 weeks of pregnancy, not the late-term procedures that anti-abortion activists refer to as "partial-birth" abortions.
To end pregnancies during the first trimester, doctors either use a procedure called "suction aspiration" or they administer medication abortions. Either method could be construed as violating the new law, Nash said. For that reason, abortion providers in South Dakota might be afraid to perform any kind of abortion procedure for fear of spending life in prison.
"If you took medication abortion at eight weeks or nine weeks, does that dismember the fetus when the miscarriage happens? I don't know," she said. "This is just a really badly drafted bill, because you don't know what it means."
South Dakota's Republican-controlled state legislature has a long history of attacking abortion rights. Both chambers passed a bill in 2006 that would have banned abortions entirely, but it was repealed by a voter referendum. In 2011, the legislature considered a bill that could have legalized the murder of abortion providers, but lawmakers shelved the bill after it sparked national outrage.
H.B. 1241 is scheduled for a hearing on Thursday in the House Health and Human Services Committee.[/quote]
Good to know that Republicans, who advocate for small Government, continue to push their archaic beliefs onto the womb of a woman. Despicable.
English
#Offtopic
-
10 通の返信This is a good thing. The protection of unborn children is very admirable, despite the misdirected hostility towards pro-life stances.
-
15 通の返信
-
35 通の返信cxkxrにより編集済み: 2/13/2014 8:36:48 PM
-
1 返信Why can't we just give them the death sentence? murder is punishable by death after all, killing a baby should earn you the lethal injection!
-
1 返信Stealth Energyにより編集済み: 2/16/2014 3:01:17 AMIf it were up to me, the abortion providers would receive the exact same fate as the abortion victims. I don't mean just killing them, I mean making sure they go the same way as the babies they aborted. It would be brutal and painful. I would have it done to them in front of their families.
-
1 返信Good, murderers are disgusting. It doesn't require government to acknowledge that.
-
9 通の返信Well I think its -blam!-ed up to kill a baby before it's born,doesn't anybody remember about adoption
-
I think this issue should be up to the people who know what they're talking about (doctors) and who it's effecting (pregnant women + their partners). Not old armchair white guys in South Dakota and not edgy/pre pube teens on an internet forum.
-
4 通の返信
-
4 通の返信I don't think many people are aware of this point, so I'm posting it here.[quote][quote]You wake up in the morning and find yourself back to back in bed with an unconscious violinist. A famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. They have therefore kidnapped you, and last night the violinist's circulatory system was plugged into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own. [If he is unplugged from you now, he will die; but] in nine months he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you.[/quote] Thomson takes it that you may now permissibly unplug yourself from the violinist even though this will cause his death: the right to life, Thomson says, does not entail the right to use another person's body, and so by unplugging the violinist you do not violate his right to life but merely deprive him of something—the use of your body—to which he has no right. "[I]f you do allow him to go on using your kidneys, this is a kindness on your part, and not something he can claim from you as his due." For the same reason, Thomson says, abortion does not violate the fetus's right to life but merely deprives the fetus of something—the use of the pregnant woman's body—to which it has no right. Thus, it is not that by terminating her pregnancy a woman violates her moral obligations, but rather that a woman who carries the fetus to term is a 'Good Samaritan' who goes beyond her obligations.[/quote][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Defense_of_Abortion#The_Violinist]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Defense_of_Abortion#The_Violinist[/url]
-
5 通の返信
-
2 通の返信
-
3 通の返信[quote]So, we should punish all teenagers who have sex (So, a majority of them) to have very little future and resort to low wage jobs that leave them on welfare, and bring children up in poor conditions that lead to an increase chance in crime and drug abuse. BUT AS LONG AS WE DON'T ALLOW ABORTIONS it's all okay.[/quote]
-
1 返信