{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/9/2014 4:14:08 AM
12
Never thought about it like that...
-
So let me get this straight: this guy is saying that since the law was designed as such as to allow you the freedom to decide to let someone die in one hypothetical scenario it should allow you that same freedom in all different scenarios? Lol. Well maybe it's different in the States, but up here in Canada we have a law that states that if you are being held at gunpoint and asked to shoot someone else to save your life, if you follow that criminal's orders and are still alive later you get arrested for murder. The hypothetical scenario is different but the intention is still clear: you are to prioritize saving someone else's life over your own. I guess that means abortion should be totally illegal in Canada, right?
-
7 通の返信As someone who's currently expecting. This is a huge deal. Everyone has their two cents, but it should all come down to the woman's choice. People are always asking what I'm planning and then making me feel like shit for my choices. -blam!- people who tell you what to do. They're not carrying a parasite for 9 months. [spoiler]Also if you must know, yes I am having it but I considered the -blam!- about abortion. [/spoiler]
-
There comes a point during the pregnancy where it's no longer about one persons body though. Arguing the right for a woman abort the baby whenever during the pregnancy is just as wrong as arguing to not allow her to abort at all.
-
20 通の返信Altnatorにより編集済み: 2/9/2014 8:43:42 AMYou made the decision the moment you took the risk of having sex without protection. You get no right to deprive the life of another for a choice you made. Otherwise you could take it as asinine as possible by saying a mother has every right to abort their child until they are 18.
-
5 通の返信Whilst it's an interesting take on things, I disagree on the concept of bodily autonomy for the deceased. Within reason of course, until medicine reaches the point of being able to synthesise blood and organs via stemcells and space magic it should be mandatory harvesting of all the useful bits from corpses with a financial compensation to the family of the deceased. *Inb4therustling* I'm 50/50 on religious exemption for this, sway me either way folks.
