{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/15/2014 2:49:14 PM
24
"I believe in Microevolution but not Macroevolution"
How to show you have no idea what the -blam!- you're taking about is to say "I believe in Microevolution but not Macroevolution"
You may as well say "I believe I can add 0.1 to 1, but those 0.1's will never cause a change into a 2"
English
#Offtopic
-
5 通の返信
-
7 通の返信Microevolution: hair changing from blonde to brown Macroevolution: hair changing from blonde to snakes like medusa. Microevolution: Bulldog changing to terrier Macroevolution: Bulldog changing into a lizard. Microevolution changes traits within species. Macroevolution changes kinds, not even species. Big difference.
-
3 通の返信
-
4 通の返信Obviously. It's like ra.ping a prostitute; pointless Microevolution has been proving and by default macroevolution. It's rather sensible really...
-
11 通の返信Chazにより編集済み: 1/15/2014 4:48:49 PMJESUS CHRIST DO YOU HAVE TO KEEP MAKING THE SAME THREADS CONCERNING THE SAME TIRED OLD DEBATES ALL THE FREAKING TIME? GAY MARRIAGE THIS, EVOLUTION THAT, GOD DOESN'T EXIST AMIRITE GUYS? I'M BEGINNING TO THINK YOU ALWAYS BANG ON ABOUT THEM BECAUSE THEY ACTUALLY REQUIRE VERY LITTLE THOUGHT ON YOUR PART TO HOLD VIEWS ON SO THEY'RE JUST EASY WAYS TO BE RIGHT. YES I AM MAD.
-
The only difference between "microevolution" and "macroevolution" is time. Seriously, that's it. These small changes that take place over small periods of time that constitute "microevolution" accumulate over millions of years and cause speciation, it's that simple.
-
30 通の返信ALI217により編集済み: 1/15/2014 6:46:04 PMGive me [i]observable[/i] proof, and by that I mean show me a video or some shit of an animal from one species becoming an animal of a different species. Oh wait, there isn't any!
-
1 返信I added 0.1 to 1 and it did not equal 2. It equaled 1.1 You can't explain that, OP.
-
5 通の返信It isn't necessarily that bad of a statement. The general idea behind it (assuming not blind ignorance) is probably that evolution happens, just not to such a great extent to cause species to diverge and create other species. It is simply a more conservative version, accepting the same observations, but with a different conclusion.
-
11 通の返信
-
1 返信
-
Really? So rather than humbly show people their ignorance and teach them kindly, you go all "HAHAHA ATHEIST/EVOLUTIONIST ELITISM LOL THEM OTHER PEOPLE SO STUPID." TBH, you've revealed your own ignorance, because that's not how micro evolution works. it's not a lot .1s becoming another number. It's changes in existing abilities/features/parts that may or may not be beneficial to the species/race/creature experiencing the changes. Micro evolution cannot create new features in a species, just change existing ones. and what Kamots said: [quote]It isn't necessarily that bad of a statement. The general idea behind it (assuming not blind ignorance) is probably that evolution happens, just not to such a great extent to cause species to diverge and create other species. It is simply a more conservative version, accepting the same observations, but with a different conclusion.[/quote]
-
[quote]It isn't necessarily that bad of a statement. The general idea behind it (assuming not blind ignorance) is probably that evolution happens, just not to such a great extent to cause species to diverge and create other species. It is simply a more conservative version, accepting the same observations, but with a different conclusion.[/quote]
-
6 通の返信
-
2 通の返信
