{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Roryrorrorpにより編集済み:
8/14/2013 11:40:11 PM
16
CoD: ghosts... why the hate?
I mean its not like you won't buy it. Yeah the campaigns always seem to be dull but the multiplayer kills time and its quite addictive. They have added some new gameplay features make it somehow fresh and I welcome that. I think the call of duty multiplayer is fun and there's a saying...
"Don't try and fix something that isn't broken".
Say what you want, but you can't deny that it rakes in the moneys.
What do you think? Do you think they could have put more changes into the gameplay? Lemme know bitchez
English
#Gaming
-
2 通の返信
-
1 返信I don't like the way you word stuff but after seeing the multiplayer reveal today I have a hard time not wanting to buy it over something like Battlefield 4. Will still be getting Killzone mainly for story. But Ghosts actually looks like it's going to be worth playing mainly since I would actually be working on a character and squad that is my own with much more customization. Also the gameplay features look pretty neat. Destructible environments are nothing new but in the way they do it is like completely altering the map sometimes rather than just a broken down building that just eliminate cover most the time. But depending how BF4 works the destruction and the depth of it, it might be worth looking into more. I'm still here and there about BF4 vs CoD Ghosts. I'm sold on CoD for now but I need to see more of what BF4 has to offer.
-
1 返信[quote]"Don't try and fix something that isn't broken".[/quote]But CoD multiplayer[i] is[/i] broken. And it looks boring. Haven't brought a CoD game since MW2, and plan to continue that trend forever.
-
Don't get me wrong, it does look like it's doing some cool things. In the end though, it's still an Infinity Ward CoD. Their games just haven't been much of any fun as of recent. Kill times are simply much too quick and map design is always rather poor. It's often more rage inducing than it is fun simply because the guy who has the other in his sights first is pretty much guaranteed a kill before the other player has any time to react. Not to mention I just flat out hate the idea of strike packages. Those should have died with MW3. I have a feeling based off of the gameplay shown that Ghosts is going to suffer for all these same reasons. I'm somewhat looking forward to Treyarch's new game if they implement most of these features though, since they tend to have fairly good kill times and good map design compared to Infinity Ward, and a bit less BS in multiplayer as well.
-
8 通の返信CoD is okay. CoD clones like Battlefield and Medal of Honor (the modern ones) are terrible.
-
LordFarquaad690により編集済み: 8/15/2013 2:29:26 AMBecause cod is so god damn late on everything, their "new innovations" are all things that have been in games for years. Character customization- been out way before halo ce. gameplay- almost always exactly the same as the previous game, every game is basically just a new and improved map pack. reactive environments- look at battlefield leaning around corners- look at the first gears of war ect. COD is not the only game series having repetitive as hell game play and minimal innovations though, in fact i think most high end games are having this problem today. Look at Halo and GoW. I am interested in the squad building thing though.
-
1 返信No clue why there is so much hate, I feel like the internet just hates COD. People complained COD never changes, they announce new features and people complain it looks dumb.
-
4 通の返信I don't know why at this point. They ask for change, they get change, and then complain about said change. What exactly do people expect them to do, really?
-
3 通の返信It looks terrible. Thats all I will say. [spoiler]And no, I'm not getting it.[/spoiler]
