If a woman sleeps with a lot of dudes, she is a ho. In fact, if she lets two guys with a threesome, she is even more of a ho. Yet if a guy gets a lot of chicks, like me, he is an Alpha. If he has threesomes with two chicks, he is above an Alpha.
Why the double standard?
Don't give me the key/lock analogy. It makes no sense. Its about sex and feeling good.
English
#Offtopic
-
1 返信Because men are so insecure they need to restrict women to make themselves feel better.
-
1 返信
-
The reason for this is because it goes inside a women all up in her organs and what not. For guys wee have skin protecting our pens so its not considered nasty. But some females are like petitions after one signs it more people sign it to and always leave their mark
-
2 通の返信
-
I've always had this belief that people are like, in charge of their own lives or something? And that maybe me coming out and putting derogatory labels on people for their harmless lifestyle choices is, like, a bad thing or something. I don't know, really.
-
18 通の返信DJ PeePantsにより編集済み: 7/11/2013 5:34:05 PMMen give it, women get it. A man has to put effort into getting into a girls pants, whereas all a woman has to do is walk up to any guy and say "F*ck Me!", and voilà. A guy who sleeps around is an Alpha because he good enough to get into a bunch of girl's pants. A woman who sleeps around a lot Is a Ho because all she has to do is give herself up to every guy she meets.
-
2 通の返信CraigWCKにより編集済み: 7/11/2013 5:53:56 PMWhy is it when women sleep with loads of dudes, they are sluts, but if us guys do it, we are gay! Double standards!
-
3 通の返信
-
[quote]If a woman sleeps with a lot of dudes, she is a ho. In fact, if she lets two guys with a threesome, she is even more of a ho. Yet if a guy gets a lot of chicks, like me, he is an Alpha. If he has threesomes with two chicks, he is above an Alpha. Why the double standard? Don't give me the key/lock analogy. It makes no sense. Its about sex and feeling good.[/quote] Was going to take this serious until i read this. [quote] Yet if a guy gets a lot of chicks, like me, he is an Alpha. [/quote] And i dont share the view you are projecting.
-
Maybe it has to do with the fact that males are more biologically driven to mate with females, and thus exert more time and energy into acquiring said female - so if a man can sleep with a lot of different women he is respected for achieving the common male goal?
-
Boltにより編集済み: 7/11/2013 6:30:28 PMIt's ubiquitous enough in human culture that it likely stems from ancient stuff. Back before we had DNA tests, or even a basic comprehension of genetics, the possibility of a male raising an offspring sired by another male was real, and something counter-productive to the continuation of one's own genes. Ancient man obviously wasn't aware of this, but the individuals that mated with chaste females (or the men that enslaved women and prevented other males from mating with them) had a benefit in terms of passing on their genes, and thus those that chose those actions persisted. There's a lot more to it, and I'd suggest you read some anthropological books on human sexuality, rather than read the trash that Gara's posting (which is clearly heavily influenced by modern western culture).
-
Madman Mordoにより編集済み: 7/11/2013 6:03:11 PMMainly because males put in 99% of the effort. It's what they're biologically driven to do. All women have to do is sit back and choose the adequate mate. In essence, it takes more effort to sleep with myriads of girls if you're a guy, whereas little needs to be done if you're a woman. Unless of course you're hideous. I can already feel the anal clenching of the feminists once they read this post...
-
6 通の返信It's not ok for either sex to sleep around, Moral decay is so rife now. As for why society sees it as ok for guy to do it rather than girls MetalicHamster summed it up perfectly.
-
2 通の返信Double Standards! Why is it when a woman sleeps with a lot of guys, she's a slut, but when a man does it, he's a homosexual?!
-
I love it when people think the lock/key analogy makes logical sense. First of all, a lock is meant to keep people out, it's supposed to protect something. In the lock-key argument, a "master key" is a rapist or is going after unlocked doors (desperate women). Secondly, keys are also meant to lock doors as well as open them. Under the lock-key analogy, a "master key" would also need to shut the doors it opens (it wouldn't be locked if something important wasn't behind it). Locking a door would be the same as keeping the girl the guy slept with. People aren't objects, so trying to make analogies like the lock-key argument really just shows how simple and narrow minded you are.