{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/9/2013 2:05:42 AM
22
Noble Six vs Master Chief
My two friends are going neck and neck about who is the better Spartan. We understand training wise, Chief is better as a Spartan II but also Noble Six has more solo experience as a Spartan III (believe it or not). This is a blade to blade fight. No AI's. No guns. Just fists, their respective armor and knifes. Try to keep the biased off. Think logistics. Give me a valid reason who would kill whom. Please and thank you!
-
1 返信DMMetalaaneにより編集済み: 6/9/2013 3:56:18 AMThe only SIII's to be given MJOLNIR were the one's who had gene's on par with SIIs. So it really only comes down to training and experience. inb4 decepticon
-
6 通の返信2 points I want to add just to see how the conversation stirs is that.. 1.) In the Animated Series Halo Legends episode "The Package", Chief goes up against an Elite in a one-on-one straight up Sword Duel...and loses. At the end of the Reach Campaign when Six is making his final stand, he goes up against about 5 or 6 Zealot Class Elites while on his back and kills about 3 of them (or 4). 2.) Chief fell from Earths Orbit right at the beginning of the Halo 3 Campaign and his armor went into immediate Lock-down. Six fell from Earths Orbit after Jorge made his great sacrifice and was able to get his ass up the moment he landed. Though wounded he was, he still showed his never-say-die spirit.
-
Chief's superior augmentations give him a significant advantage over noble six. He's probably also better trained in hand-to-hand combat since Spartan IIs underwent a much more vigorous training program than the Spartan IIIs.
-
1 返信Well, Noble Six was technically [i]you[/i]. Are you better than the Master Chief?
-
1 返信Both are Hyper Lethal Vectors, and should be killing Covenant rather then fighting each other.
-
Master Chief would destroy Nobel 6's ass. This is like a King Tiger tank having a 1 on 1 with a M4 Sherman. The augmentations for the Spartan 2's have better results. Yes the Spartan 3's are still good, but they are still physically inferior to Spartan-II's. Also the Spartan 2's have greater reflexes. The Spartan 2's have a 1400% boost while the Spartan 3's have only 300. That's more than double the Spartan 3's. If 6 is lucky he would be able to barley keep track of the Chiefs movements.
-
8 通の返信Chief, no contest. S3's are made to be expendable, his armor simply isn't nearly as good, nor is his training.
-
3 通の返信Spartan-IIIs had far less training than the IIs. The Chief could move in quiet and take down 6; he could snipe him from klicks away; he could allow his stronger armour to take more damage and go in for a frontal assault. In the end John would win. John has been solo since the Fall of Reach, he is well equipped. Even before that he could win alone.
-
Inyaccurateにより編集済み: 6/9/2013 2:17:09 AMThe Spartan II's were made to be nearly invincible super soldiers, dealing with enemies through raw power and agility, while the Spartan III's were made as a sort of desperate act to deal with the covenant, overwhelming enemies through sheer numbers. This would lead me to believe that the Chief would win in a fight, not to mention a crucial factor of the Chief's factor; the Chief has luck.
-
In a battle of the fisticuffs, Chief would win hands down. Spartan II's are physically superior to the Spartan III's, and as you said, Chief has more training. I believe in one of the comic books he takes down 3 ODST's and actually kills one accidentally, all with his bare hands and without MJOLNIR armor.
-
Broseph Stalinにより編集済み: 6/9/2013 2:08:19 AMChief would beat Six, but not without a tough fight. EDIT: Reason why is that Chief, being a Spartan II, had more augmentations administered to him than Noble Six did. His body is simply superior, he can attack harder and withstand more punishment than Six could.
