{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/26/2021 6:51:28 PM
5
That would be the case, if it wasn't for the worm occupying a husk host.
Savathun is to infinity and beyond your feeble comprehension. That isn't even her name anymore, but the player piece on the game board influencing by not influencing anything. Letting everything fall into place with just an idea, while she watchs all things follow their Destiny.
English
-
She just needs to be without definition and just exist outside of terms set by everything, I don't even like using she for a being that wants to be bigger than the entirety of existence, a being that wants to hold existence hostage to their will...if they want to be what is perceived as God holding all existence, well you will struggle for eternity...unless you use and define existence without definition. Confucius say... Anyways, if she/it wants to control it, usher in the end of everything, control everything, go ahead...wait until you get bored of eternity, and I know she/it has to see that...it's -blam!-ing boring, it sucks, and she can have it.
-
You can use she when referring to the pawn. Savathun is both the pawn and the player making the moves. The point is the progression of the game. Everything ends eventually, and once the game is finished, and all the pieces have been utilized for victory, then the cycle begins anew.
