Writing is easy for me. Maybe you’re conditioned by Twitters 150 limit? Do I need to shorten them and use simpler words? Don’t want you to try too hard. Well let’s see, you conflated two things as one. There is the word toxic and how it’s being used, which is one subject. Then there is your behavior and my opinion of you, second subject. Disagreeing with use of the word toxic by one degree doesn’t mean I can’t insult your idiocy by a greater degree. Two different things. Naturally you make a improper conflation again. Telling you that you are a hypocrite is not taking umbrage at what you said nor is it hypocrisy on my part. You positioned yourself as the moral one, I never made such a claim. By doing so, you set the bar higher for [i]yourself[/i]. That’s the problem with the moral high ground, it has rules and restrictions. That’s why it’s generally the better position. You can’t whine about negative behavior and then engage in negative behavior. It’s hypocritical. “Put forth” lol dude don’t try to use words you never use. It’s painfully obvious. You want to be Mr Holier than thou? You gotta walk the talk son. Instead you’re hollow. You pretend virtue.

You keep assuming that me pointing out your needless snarks and pointless nitpicking over terminology is "whining", and then you get uppity when I give you a dose of your own medicine. I knew full well what I was doing, and I knew you'd spit your dummy out over it. So here we are 😂

No, I said your whining about other people’s losses. That you are here crying over someone else’s losses. I haven’t said much about your complaining about my snarking except it being hypocritical when you engage in it also. You played the moral card, you can’t claim it then not follow through. That’s no different then saying AFKing is bad and then doing it yourself. Yet here you are, moving away from the topic of the debate to try and twist the onus onto me. You played the moral high ground. Then got in the mud with me and said I’m the hypocrite. It’s laughable how much effort your putting into excusing your behavior by blaming me for it. As if you have no responsibility for your behavior and words. You knew you were being a hypocrite and did it just to derail the argument since you were losing. Like I said, intentional dishonesty dressed up as hollow virtue. How sad. 🤡🤡

Losing what? Subjective opinion over the use of a slang term? Bruh. You came at me first, you've been attempting to call me names since the early posts of this argument, you're [i]still[/i] trying to even now. As fun as its been living rent free in your head for over a day now, I've got a Nandos meal to eat. Ta-ta 👋

The argument. Attempting? I belittle people directly, like I’ve done you. Besides, you had no problem name calling other people, why take such great offense when it comes your way? Oh yeah that’s right, Mr Holier than Thou. Considering you’ve been going tit for tat, can’t say I haven’t been living in your head either. Nice try lol What is Nandos? Never heard of it.

Who said I took offense? I poked you back and [i]you[/i] took umbrage to it. Nandos... if it takes off over there like it has here you'll know it well enough soon enough.

You can’t whine about people being inconsiderate and then delve into worse behavior and still claim the moral card. I pointed out your hypocrisy, you tried to turn it around as my calling it out as being rustled. Somehow pointing out your flaws is me taking umbrage. A weak attempt at deflection. One that you keep repeating lol Eh, whatever.

There it is again lol, it seems you're incapable of debating without the assumption the other person is crying/whining, whilst demanding the other person not sink to your level lest you call them a hypocrite for it. Heh. I honestly would have disengaged from this a long time ago were this not as amusing as its become. I await your next "no u".

[quote]There it is again lol, it seems you're incapable of debating without the assumption the other person is crying/whining, whilst demanding the other person not sink to your level lest you call them a hypocrite for it. Heh. I honestly would have disengaged from this a long time ago were this not as amusing as its become. I await your next "no u".[/quote] You are whining. You complained about something that happened to someone else while calling something that is merely irritating as being toxic. Funny how you never once responded to my pointing out how actively playing players can just as easily cause irritation. So by your own metric, even people playing who aren’t doing well and dragging down their team are being toxic. Anytime anyone does anything irritating, which is an amazingly subjective standard to use by the way, is a toxic drag on the community. Sure pal. You keep stroking that ego.

[quote]You are whining. You complained about something that happened to someone else while calling something that is merely irritating as being toxic.[/quote] Pointing out a way to act more considerately is "whining"? It seems you have a curious take on what constitutes whining [quote]Funny how you never once responded to my pointing out how actively playing players can just as easily cause irritation. [/quote] Because its a total strawman lol. This is nowhere close to the gotcha you think it is. [i]Well you think THATS toxic? How about this even more toxic behaviour?!?!?![/i] Where are you even going with that? 😂 [quote]So by your own metric, even people playing who aren’t doing well and dragging down their team are being toxic.[/quote] Nah, because thats not on purpose. I would have thought that was obvious, but then I suppose if you're grasping at straws... [quote]Anytime anyone does anything irritating, which is an amazingly subjective standard to use by the way, is a toxic drag on the community.[/quote] Intentionally? Yup. As I said its very curious that you choose to nitpick over terminology. Weird hill to die on.

Playing for bounties or quests is intentional too and that behavior negatively impacts players. They could earn them slower and help their team. Funny how you only selected one out of the list to respond to. There’s that selective response, like I won’t see it or call it out. Where am I going with it? Pointing out the absurdity of calling anything irritating as toxic. As it’s been pointed out people can have very different criteria for what is and isn’t irritating. You and I have very different standards, as we’ve already covered. So whose standard do we use? Yours? Mine? Random Blueberry #20? I mean some people here call a stomp toxic. Like winners are supposed to let the losing team get close so as not to bruise their delicate egos. Never in all my years of gaming have I seen such absurdity as the whiners here display.

[quote]Playing for bounties or quests is intentional too and that behavior negatively impacts players. They could earn them slower and help their team. Funny how you only selected one out of the list to respond to. There’s that selective response, like I won’t see it or call it out.[/quote] I addressed the topic of the thread lol. What list did OP provide? 🤔 [quote]Where am I going with it? Pointing out the absurdity of calling anything irritating as toxic. As it’s been pointed out people can have very different criteria for what is and isn’t irritating.[/quote] The intent is the key part. Werent you just accusing me of skipping over something? At least in my case, it was non-existant. [quote]You and I have very different standards, as we’ve already covered. So whose standard do we use? Yours? Mine? Random Blueberry #20?[/quote] Well, generally for one to be whining, they'd have to be petulant, as opposed to, y'know, merely suggesting a more considerate course of action 😂

Merely suggesting? You made multiple [i]insults[/i] to the people afking. Not just me, you went about insulting people you never encountered. I love it. How quickly you seem to forget your own toxicity when it comes to describing your own actions. There it is again, Mr Holier than Thou.