{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/23/2019 2:54:58 PM
2
Eververse is simply too expensive, both regard Silver and Bright Dust.
One Exotic Emote reachs the price of 4250 Bright Dust or 1000 Silver (which are basically 10 Euro/Dollars). It is simply too much. Yes, we can farm Bright Dust, this is true, but since the launch of Shadowkeep it seems that we need ages just to collect a little ammount of it. And yes, these are just Exstetic Items so they are not really important in the end, but there are players who also enjoy the "fashion side" of the game, and they may feel themselves cut out from it. Also, we don't have a Seasonal Engram, which means that the only way to obtain these items is by buying them with Bright Dust.
Right now I'm keeping my Bright Dust only for very few things like the Empireal Cartographer Armor Ornaments and I'm avoiding to buy other Sparrows, Shells or Exotic Emotes in general.
P.S: @Cozmo, this should be one of those threads that you should check and pass the feedback to the whatever Bungie's team is behind Eververse.
English
-
I honestly feel like saying "we can farm Bright Dust" is a severe overstatement. We get 3 times 2 bounties of 200 dust per week, plus as many bounties we want, which are only 10 dust per piece with a max of 5 per run. But it's still technically farmable, so yeah... I'm just not sure what would be a good "fix" for the situation. Whether it's bringing back the seasonal engrams or upping the dust you get from bounties. At this point I'll take either, assuming the engrams drop at the same level intervals as before or the bounties would give in 200+ per bounty as a minimum
-
They could add a flat amount of dust you get per bright engram, they already toned down the amount of bright engrams you get, so getting a good 500 bright dust per bright engram wouldn't be too much to ask (100 per level up, essentially).
