{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/15/2018 2:23:50 AM
304
Could You Just STOP... Just... DON'T
Stop hollering, bitching, and crying for nerfs. A year ago, our abilities and weapons felt too underwhelming. Bungie makes us powerful, and now you want it dialed back down. No nerfing the Sleeper. No nerfing the Shoulder Charge. No nerfing the Primeval's strength and difficulty. No nerfing the shotgun. Many of us have been wrecked by the same shit that wrecked you. And do you know what we did? We ADAPTED. We figured out how to counter that shit and got gud. None of us want a shit game again.
Shut up.
No goddamn nerfs.
English
#destiny2
-
1 返信Yup and some of us couldn't git gud but accepted the fact that there are better players out there.
-
2 通の返信Thank God Red Dead 2 comes out in 10 days. This franchise has been ruined by PvP cancer.
-
Ok sleeper nerf is pretty much to prevent people from just blindly walking and not even aiming down sites. Im fine with shoulder charge. I dont know why people want to nerf primeval. And for shotguns we have telesto.
-
whateverman7により編集済み: 10/16/2018 10:02:40 PMYep, and we the community, are the only people that can be blamed when it comes to nerfs. For the most part, bungie has buffed in d2, not nerfed; yet the community keeps asking for nerfs, smh.
-
3 通の返信Buff shotguns, Sleeper, Telesto, Titan charge, bow headshots should be ohk's, sell masterwork cores for real money Nerf scout rifles again, golden gun, sidearms, eververse, and ghost shells
-
1 返信
-
1 返信CallM3_Captain36により編集済み: 10/18/2018 10:43:06 AMBet you were one of the people who whined about wormhusk for a whole 3 months. And before that invis which both got huge nerfs and are unusable (except invis in pve)
-
12 通の返信Lol could we dial back the primevals stomp that makes me go from a warlock to a "wizard from the moon".
-
2 通の返信
-
55 通の返信
-
6 通の返信
-
2 通の返信Zambyにより編集済み: 10/16/2018 4:26:47 PMNow I'm not saying that Bungie doesn't patch things for no reason, but clearly you have NEVER played the game if you think that there aren't some balancing issues! The issues are so obvious that I could write an essay on them but I'm going to name a few instead. -Nova warp is the push L and press R2 super (PS4) -Sleeper Simulant is the Gambit god and NEEDS increased charge time -Shoulder charge is still gross It is sooo far fetched to say that Bungie needs to stop nerfs and buffs. If Bungie were to stop getting involved with the game at all we would've been on Destiny 7 because all they would care about is putting out game after game instead actually FIXING IT! To tell Bungie to stop putting in nerfs and buffs is like saying this.... -Make Game -It's broken -Ignore -Make new game -??? -Money (Repeat) Common sense is a big part of writing a "rant" or complaint. So next time think before you write stupid shit on the internet! -Sincerely the smart side of the internet :)
-
1 返信It's valid to say that things should be powerful and feel good. It's also valid to say that things should be balanced. Should Sleeper's damage take a hit? Maybe just a little bit, so it can't 1-hit body through overshield, but instead leave someone real low. A better plan, probably, would be to make it so that you can't pre-fire. Once you hit that trigger, you're committed. Doesn't devalue the catalyst, doesn't change the weapon other than that you can't sit there almost charging it behind cover. IKELOS shotgun is the game's real problem child. Trench Barrel needs tuning, bad. any gun that can single-handedly trivialize pretty much every boss in the game is an issue, there's a reason we didn't see Gjallarhorn come back. Honestly though? If they made it Exotic it might be fine.
-
1 返信It’s too late. They nerfed hunter abilities and exotics so it’s only logical and fair that nerfs are now the thing. Once it starts it never ends.
-
3 通の返信
-
3 通の返信Only thing that needs “adjusting” is luna howl. That is pure op you can’t even argue that
