{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/17/2016 10:34:50 PM
20
A video for Reach fans...
-
I don't know what to think about the comment section, from his other videos people can come to an understanding despite some things said, but reach it is like you say it's bad, how dare you, the gods will look down upon the and smite thee for insulting my nostalgia. They are so defensive despite how legitimate his points are.
-
Reach was good if you liked the game types that weren't too serious, but can still be competitive. BTB, Snipers, and SWAT in Reach were my favorite of those game types in the franchise. Team Slayer was really, really horrible with bloom and armor abilities. I think Reach was a testing of sorts for Destiny. And you can change the settings in firefight to make it more like ODST.
-
2 通の返信
-
4 通の返信Was watching YouTube last night. Saw this video in the recommendations but didn't bother to watch. Bump for later I guess
-
1 返信
-
2 通の返信
-
1 返信
-
9 通の返信There are things that I can agree on , things I can disagree on, but regardless it was a solid assessment and I'd have to watch the other videos to check for bias. The only guaranteed downside is that piss poor narration voice.
-
Jesus, that voice. Anyway, I enjoyed Reach. Bloom, Armour-Lock, no damage bleed and somewhat poor map design kept Reach from being my personal favorite in the series, though there were some redeeming qualities to it — Invasion was a great gametype (which they should bring back), the weapon, vehicle and armour selection was unrivaled until the most recent game, the campaign was fantastic, and, well, Forge World. Personal opinion of course, but this guy is overtly accentuating quite a lot of his own gripes with the game and cutting a few half truths in order to perpetuate his narrative. There are definitely a few legitimate and objective complaints to be had with Reach, though his irrational and pretentious assertions prevent me from agreeing with him.
-
1 返信I absolutely love his videos for the other ones (still haven't watched his ones Halo 3 or Reach). It's a shame they don't have more views.
-
9 通の返信
-
3 通の返信Tartan 118により編集済み: 10/18/2016 2:08:11 PMI'm surprised this guy wasn't a bigger critic of H3's Campaign. I definitely was at launch, and though my opinion has softened with time and the consequent nostalgia, it's still a poorly-paced and plotted game. It's not entirely the game's fault, though, in and of itself - Bungie's marketing kicked off with a tease of the Ark portal, in the target of a cutscene that didn't even appear until halfway through the game. That rendered the vast majority of Halo 3's first half uninteresting and, dare I say it, irrelevant: who cares about Crow's Nest and heading to Voi when we all know John's going to be stood over the dig site and watching that colossal structure open in a few missions? Were those missions fun? Well, largely. But it's a first-person Halo, that's a given. What almost always drives these missions on macroscopic level is how they feed into the overarching narrative. Not something any of Sierra 117 through to the Storm really did. Halo CE tasked us with rescuing Keyes, a vital character both at the beginning and end of the game. Halo 2 used Regret's hasty invasion of Earth to set up politicking at the top of the Covenant, adding another a self-serving facet to Truth's calculating persona. Halo 3 did nothing of the sort, to my recollection. Also... whose great plan was it to remove the franchise's most iconic enemies for the last two levels? 'Nuff said there.
-
2 通の返信
-
3 通の返信The game is solid but there's some things that still bug me about it like [spoiler]Armor lock[/spoiler]
-
1 返信I'm going to watch this later. Here's a bump for now, until I can give an actual opinion.
-
2 通の返信
