Why do u believe in a force u can't explain? And saying, "objects with larger mass bend space, drawing objects of lesser mass toward their center" is not an explanation. It's merely a statement of what others have been told. I can see that the earth is flat: the ground does not move beneath me when I jump.
YOU CANT EXPLAIN GRAVITY. So why do u believe it? It is because just like in Sunday school, public school fed u a system of belief which u never questioned and which u still don't question. Science is your faith.
-
If this is bait, good one. If not... According to conventional thinking (Einstein's Relativity), gravity is the result of large amounts of mass causing ripples in spacetime. According to a more ambitious theory, M-Theory, gravity is the phenomena of free ended strings of energy that are capable of "floating" through branes (2 dimensional strings, on which our universe may be). That would explain why gravity is such a weak force compared to the other forces (electromagnetism, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force). Gravity behaves very strangely as it acts according to Newton's formulae on large scale, but switches to quantum mechanics on the atomic scale.
-
[url=https://www.google.com/search?site=webhp&tbm=isch&source=hp&ei=Y5hoV-WmM8nEjwPflKSABA&q=family+guy+who+cares&oq=family+guy+who+cares&gs_l=mobile-gws-hp.3..0l2j0i8i30j0i24.2909.7318.0.7789.21.14.0.1.1.0.1604.9223.3-2j3j3j3j1j1.13.0....0...1c.1.64.mobile-gws-hp..9.12.7322.1..41.HSEX9HPi1BA#imgrc=J3JfifWU6h1mcM%3A]ಠ_ಠ[/url]
-
2 通の返信
-
1 返信
-
Mass creates gravity because the weight of a chicken is multiple of a feather, while a dog minus hair, plus violent copulation with a cat, generates enough light to bend Mother Mary over a table while Muhammad knocks on the back door, and Buddha gets his lollipop licked. Simple mathematics, don't you understand anything about geography?
-
1 返信[b][i]How to prove gravity[/i][/b] See those stars up above? Those nuclear fusion reactors in the sky? Well Flat Earthers say those create Universal Winds created by the heat of these objects. Well, you should know that thermal radiation capable of overcoming the inertia of a planet would require massive stars since energy decays at 1/distance^2. To combat this issue, FEers say that the stars are much smaller and much closer. Cool, but guess what...nuclear fusion can't happen in a star by pure heat. The amount of heat needed to start nuclear fusion is around 1 billion Kelvin but our sun's hydrogen and helium core only has heat ranging from 15 million degrees Kelvin. So how does the Sun generate heat when it doesn't have enough energy to start nuclear fusion? Gravity. The gravity of the star forces the highly energised particles to smash into one another. If a star was small enough to be closer without killing us and provide the force needed to create a universal accelerant that would eventually surpass the speed of light, it wouldn't even burn. [b][i]How to disprove a universal accelerant[/i][/b] Max speed is 3E^8 m/s Universal accelerant at 9.8 m/s^2 would reach this speed in 30, 612, 244.9 seconds That number is 510k hours 21k days 1771 years. We would transcend the speed of light, assuming the world was created at 0 BC, before the Constitution of the United States was written. Also, why is a Universal accelerant only applicable to objects on Earth? We know objects on the moon and Mars have accelerations 1/6th and a 1/4th of Earth, respectively. And we know we have been to the moon since we can use a telescope and see the flag we put up there and the massive mirrors we put up there to measure distance
-
4 通の返信
-
2 通の返信Kamotsにより編集済み: 6/19/2016 12:24:20 PMYour right, I can't. However, for a different reason. Mass doesn't create gravity. Gravity is also a fundamental characteristic of space-time that results from uneven energy distributions in the universe. It's been shown that one can cause a gravitational pull with no mass at all.
-
1 返信IAmJoshmanにより編集済み: 6/20/2016 11:27:30 PMI believe in you Krishna, the Earth is flat, but not in the sense that you might think.
-
2 通の返信KingLukas0474により編集済み: 6/19/2016 5:22:30 PM
-
3 通の返信jordanc_535により編集済み: 6/19/2016 11:36:29 PMGravity is a property of matter/energy. It just is. That's like asking why the universe is so big. It just is.
-
1 返信Explain to me why you dream, hint, you can't. But you still dream, right? You can't prove you can dream, but you still believe you do right? How about instead of asking us to prove that gravity doesn't exist, you give some proof as to why gravity [b]isn't [/b]real. Oh, wait, You can't.
-
2 通の返信IMADAJにより編集済み: 6/20/2016 9:50:14 AM
-
3 通の返信
-
2 通の返信Alph4 Cent4uriにより編集済み: 6/20/2016 12:49:39 PMUmmm no why dont you show us proof that the world is flat instead? And you saying it is isnt proof,i want actual physical,scientific proof that the world is flat and your not just some other nut job whos high as hell. You cant can you cause your just some nut job with no life.......what i bet you think the moon is really cheese and space is a figment of everyones imagination too. What rock do these people crawl out from,surely with all our technology we can destroy said rock.
-
3 通の返信
-
1 返信
-
12 通の返信Just a bit of a theory here, no h8 You see, there are more types of magnetism then the ferro magnetism that holds iron cobalt and nickel. So, when an object is hurtling around space, little gas particles are attracted by it's magnetism. Eventually a slight atmosphere forms and the pressure of all the gases coming in could cause gravity.
-
4 通の返信This equation right here. Part of Einstein's [u]theory[/u] of relativity. However, most things in science are theories. But like most, can be 99.99% accurate. And like most, his theory has held very true to this day.
-
17 通の返信bren12310により編集済み: 6/20/2016 12:02:38 PMYou can't prove anything in science For every fact there is a fact that goes against it Even evolution, there may seem like there is overwhelming evidence for it, however if you just read a science textbook you will find that there's actually even more evidence that goes against it. There is actually more evidence that the bible is true than there is evidence that evolution is real (Please don't get butthurt, it's just a comment that is backed up with evidence that I have received from numerous sources.) Edit: why don't atheists get butt hurt so easily? Not all of them, just a lot of them
-
In an insane asylum, three patients are up for release. The Doctor decides to give them an intelligence test. He turns to the first man and asks, "What is three times three?" "274," he replies. The Doctor asks the second man, "What is three times three?" "Tuesday," replies the second man. The Doctor turns to the third man, "Okay, your turn. What's three times three?" "Nine," says the third man proudly. "That's great!" says the doctor. "How did you arrive at that?" "Simple," says the third man. "I subtracted 274 from Tuesday."