I don't have a problem with the buff
Why did they buff auto's in the first place?
I really don't give a f***
TechyWizardにより編集済み: 3/25/2015 5:53:37 PMI agree. But I believe they should remove the nerf from auto rifles, mainly because if destiny is going to have a weapon that does more DPs then the Vex Mythoclast, (aka pulse rifles) then other primarys need to be able to compete with that. Frankly, if auto rifles are going to compete with pulse rifles, then the current damage models for auto rifles have to be reworked, or reversed to the pre-nerf damage. The main complaint for pro auto rifle nerf people is: "Auto rifles are op because anyone can use them" and my response is: Auto rifles are not op, they have a lot of nerfs, their stability, their range, and their magazine size is their main detriment." I do believe that certain auto rifles should be buffed just a small bit, aka SUROS regime, because if you are going to have a low fire rate, you need to be compensated by a higher damage.( like 2 or 3 damage) And for every other vanquisher type auto rifle, I believe they need to be buffed by 7 - 8 damage. And for for hard light type auto rifles, I think they need to be buffed by 3 - 4 damage. This is only my opinion so please don't take offense. Thank you.