JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Service Warning
Destiny 2 will be temporarily offline tomorrow for scheduled maintenance. Please stay tuned to @BungieHelp for updates.

Destiny 2

Discuss all things Destiny 2.
10/22/2020 10:00:25 PM
43

Good job on 110 HC buff, but removing 150s was a mistake

I am happy with almost every balance change from the TWAB, except the removal of 150RPM handcannons. I personally prefer 140s and used to use them over 150s despite their ttk being higher. I don't see how you could buff autos to have a .8 TTK, but not leave a HC archetype that can do the same. People wanted more range and better perks on 140s over 150s... not the removal of 150s. Even with these changes, 600 autos are still likely to dominate over 140s in crucible. Still, I'm very satisfied with this last TWAB. Overall, I like the direction you're moving toward.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Not saying the merger shouldn’t have been the other way around - but 150s did give hunters an inherent buff to dodge cooldown. No other class got a buff to their class ability just by selecting a primary weapon that also had an optimal .8 ttk without empowering effects or kill clip or whatever. I think a better approach would have been to make adaptives 150s and drop the access to lightweight buffs to hunter mobility & class ability specifically. This would at least have put warlocks, hunters, and titans more on par with each other. And kept 150s competitive.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon