JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Group Avatar

Psykana Librarius

"Play nice, you have no rights. Well, you do, but what are rights if not socially binding concepts?"

Solicitud de ingreso
  • Misión

    This group is a hub area to collect various psychology related threads, such as research and study results or interesting blogs/pictures, though other academic discussion (sciences, politics, sociology, anthropology, etc) is allowed and encouraged. Also mini-essays and question posts may make an appearance from time to time. Anyone can join, but only a few can post public topics. Check your opinions for others at the door and keep things civil.

  • Suscripciones

    34 Miembros
    Número total de usuarios que se han unido a este grupo
    11 Años como grupo
    Total de años que este grupo lleva activo
  • Administradores

  • Etiquetado:

publicado originalmente en:Psykana Librarius
3/28/2014 4:45:56 PM
11

New tech could remove exams, and be more accurate

I like this concept

30

I dislike this concept

1

Other [comment please]

0

Long read, TL;DR at bottom. [quote]Major exams are the bane of many a student’s life. They represent a one-off chance to scribble months or years of learning onto paper, and can make or break future career prospects. The trouble is that taking an exam at a time rigidly set by the academic calendar has never been an ideal way to determine competence – they may come at the right time for some lucky students, but not for many others. Perhaps it doesn’t have to be that way. As teaching begins to move online, we no longer need to wait until the end of a course to perform assessments. Instead, [b]computer software can assess understanding during the learning process itself by analysing a student’s every mouse click and keystroke.[/b] So could we finally be able to get rid of the dreaded final exam? A better option is a system that allows students to advance at their own pace, as and when they have mastered the material, says Julia Freeland an education researcher at the Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation in San Mateo, California. This is called competency-based learning, and it requires tailoring the educational programme in a different way for each student. This is clearly something that teachers in a busy classroom may struggle to do. [b]If course material is offered online, though, with the student’s input analysed automatically by computer software, students can be assessed individually – even to the point that the software can identify when a given student is likely to perform to their full potential on an exam.[/b] Competency-based learning software is now being used both in high schools and in colleges across the US, says Freeland. [b]The Virtual Learning Academy Charter School in the state of New Hampshire is one prominent high school example. Western Governors University, an online institution based in Salt Lake City, Utah, introduced competency-based learning software in 2012. Arizona State University made a similar move in 2011. [/b] The idea behind the software is relatively straightforward. It takes information about the student’s activity on a course website – the pages they have visited and whether the student has verified that they have read a passage of text or watched a video, for instance – and combines it with data on the student’s performance on informal tests and quizzes to establish in real time how well the student understands a concept. When that understanding reaches a predetermined level, the student is challenged with new concepts, or offered the opportunity to take a formal exam. Since this form of competency-based learning approach was introduced in some classes at Arizona State University, pass rates have reportedly increased. And Philip Regier, the dean of the university’s online arm, says there are now plans for doing “an entire degree adaptively”.[/quote] TL;DR: Making the whole course digital would enable teachers to accurately measure competency, and remove simple "regurgitation" at tests. Essentially, homework and quizzes are the core of your grade. I think this is great, I don't mind exams much, but having taken two of them yesterday, I can say I do get a little bit jittery before them, just one error has far more effect on your grade than a perfectly done piece of homework.

Publicando en idioma:

 

Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

  • I have used Khan Academy, NetAcad, and my own university's software (as both a student and staff member) and while they are good (especially KA), there are some fairly obvious issues that I've come across here or as an educator: 1) The lack of feedback and interaction between teacher and student is a problem. A teacher who is in the same physical location can much more easily help a student who is having issues with the work. 2) Although it doesn't mention how exactly it would be used, if we tell students to simply go off and do the work whenever they want, I don't think many will, simply because they may not want to do it. If they're forced to show up to classes and participate, they're much more likely to really learn something and get their work done. 3) Computer aided testing doesn't alleviate regurgitation in the slightest. In fact, it probably makes it more of an issue since questions are [typically/sometimes] created by the publishers of the content for the class (in my experience as both a student and educator). 4) The biggest concern is collusion. If a student is sitting in a classroom or exam hall, I can walk around and see them: a) doing their own work; and b) not using additional content (ie. cheat sheets, scribbles, electronic devices). If they're working at a computer which is: a) not owned/managed by an educational institution; b) cannot be checked for illegal software (for cheating); and c) not in the same physical location as the educator I cannot know whether the answers they give are their own, from a web page, from someone on Skype, etc... This is why any online tests that exist and contribute to the overall mark cannot be worth a lot (maybe only 10%). In my experience, online tests have only really existed as an incentive to get students to read the content - if they want marks, they have to read - but not so much for competency. --- I would be very apprehensive about completely using computer-aided testing for any serious accreditation.

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

  • Cool. Exams (and school in general I think) are too stressful for people these days; anything to lessen that load is a good thing.

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

  • Damn this comes now after I put in all the hard work

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

    2 Respuestas
    • [b] [/b]

      Publicando en idioma:

       

      Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

    • As a long time regurgitator of exams, I am a huge fan of this concept. I like the working environment (i.e. projects, papers, presentations, etc) and find that it is.. different from writing exams. I like a friendly dynamic working environment. So, I made the transition from traditional school exams to studying online, and I am in the midst of learning in a whole new way. As much as I want to get back into a working environment with a like-minded team, I find that the learning process has been personally enhanced while I`m away. I for one, can`t get enough information streaming from my monitor. I didn`t even know how advanced the technology is that has the potential to monitor my every keystroke. I am fascinated and would love to learn more... To throw in my two cents about it: a human element is always important, because the monitoring system is static... Unless AI (or amazingly advanced self-writing code) has already been invented, and someone has yet to tell me about it lolz. From my searches and conversations with AI bots... I think it is yet to be the case. :)

      Publicando en idioma:

       

      Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

    • Let's just download it all like the Matrix. That'll solve issue we have now (and make a million more later).

      Publicando en idioma:

       

      Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

    • If I were in school I'd give it a go. Might even fix some educational shit here in the US.

      Publicando en idioma:

       

      Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

    • While I dislike the thought of an entire class being digitized and homework gaining a much more important role, that actually sounds like an awesome idea. I've personally had classes that moved at almost a snail's pace because some students didn't always understand the stuff as fast as everyone else, and I have also been in that same situation, so I know that would probably help out a lot more people compared to current rules and standardized tests. But what would happen if someone were to finish all their classes and any final exams like a week and a half before the end of the semester? Would they be required to keep coming to school? Because that sounds kind of important to answer.

      Publicando en idioma:

       

      Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

      1 Respuesta
      • On the World service but not on the actual BBC site? Come on now.

        Publicando en idioma:

         

        Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

        4 Respuestas
        • Editado por Psy: 3/28/2014 4:53:46 PM
          1
          It's a great idea. Exams and the real world of work are two different planets. Competency assessments would be a more comprehensive way of seeing if someone is worth hiring in the future or not, rather than basing their entire future on whether or not they had a shit day and screwed up an exam.

          Publicando en idioma:

           

          Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

          2 Respuestas
          • I'm mixed on this. On one hand, the article is right when they say that the time that the test is taken is important and may not completely reveal the competence of the test takers. On the other hand, we should be VERY cautious with making courses more digital. It's generally not the teaching abilities that needs to be refined in classrooms, but the people skills of the teacher. Being a student, here's a trend I have noticed: More technology in class = less interaction between the teacher and the students. That's not a good thing.

            Publicando en idioma:

             

            Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

            3 Respuestas
            No se te permite acceder a este contenido.
            ;
            preload icon
            preload icon
            preload icon